08/26/1974 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

- - 3. South of 17th Avenue, west of Chambers Street - From R-l to R-2 SR (Countryman (0320) Realty) Recommended by the Planning Commission on July 2, 1974. Copies of Planning Commission staff notes 'and minutes of that meeting were previously distributed to Council members. ~ No ex parte contacts or conflicts of interest were declared by Council members. .., Jim Saul, planner, said the primary reason for the rezoning was to assure development of the property under R-2 so as not to disturb the privacy of single-family properties south of the site. Other adjacent properties were developed in C-l uses. Public hearing was held with no testimony presen~d. Council Bill No. 635 - Rezoning to R-2 SR area south of 17th Avenue west of Chambers STreet was read by council bill number and title only, there being no councilman present requesting that it be read in full. Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Hershner that findings supporting rezoning as set out in the Planning Commission staff notes and minutes of' July 2, 1974 be adopted by reference thereto, that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered at this time. \ Motion carried unanimously, and the-bill was read the second time by council bill number only. Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Hershner that the bill be approved and given final ~ passage. Rollcall vote. All Council members present voting aye, the bill was declared ,., passed and numbered 17163. ~- 4. East of Coburg Road,south of Willakenzie from RA to C-2'SR and Outlying C~mmercial (0352) Sign District (Wayne Weber) Recommended by the Planning Commission on July 9, 1974. Copies of Planning Commission staff notes and minutes of that meeting were previously -distributed to Council members. No ex parte contacts or conflicts of interest were declared by Council members. Jim Saul, planner, reviewed the history of zone changes on this property culminating in development on the commercially zoned portion. The Commission, he said, in evaluating the buffering effect of the pending RP portion (held for approval of a planned unit development which was abandoned) felt the buffering could just as well be achieved through site review procedures. The Commission's concerns in making its recommendation for approval dealt with the relationship between teh proposed C-2 portion and adjacent residential development to the east. Public hearing was opened with no testimony presented: Council Bill No. 636 - Rezoning to C-2 SR area east of Coburg Road south of Willakenzie Road with Otitlying Commercial Sign District ~ was read by council bill number and title only, there being no councilman ,., present requesting that it. be read in,cfull. Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Hershner that findings supporting rezoning as set out in the Planning Commission staff notes and minutes of July 9, 1974 be adopted by reference thereto, that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously, and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Hershner that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall vote. All Council members present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 17154. I 5. South of 13th and east of High - From C-2 to R~S-.83 with ~ensity of one dwelling (0424) unit per 830 square feet and sign district change from Pedestrian-Auto to Residential (Oscat Krumdieck) Recommended by the Planning Commission on July 9, 1974. Copies of Planning Commission- staff notes and minutes of that meeting were previeusly distributed to Council members. No ex parte contacts or conflicts of interest were declared by Council members. Jim Saul, planner, explained that the initial request was for,R-4. However, the ~ Commission recommended instead R-3 with a maximum density equivalent to ten units -- per acre, achieved by the .83 suffix providing for one dwelling unit per 830 square feet. The requested R-4 would have allowed a density equivalent to 20 units per acre and under the existing C-2 zoning a conditional use permit would have allowed de- velopment of apartments with R-4 density limitations. The recommended sign district. change to Residential was considered in keeping whh the proposed rezoning. 8/26/74 - 4 2C}7