Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e found that a franchise fee of five percent did not cover the full cost of creating <br /> and maintaining the public right-of-way. <br /> I!. DISCUSSION WITH NEIGHBORHOOD LEADERS REGARDING URBAN RENEWAL <br /> Members of the council and the Eugene Neighborhood Leaders Council introduced <br /> themselves. The following Neighborhood Leaders were present: Ada Joyner, Jan <br /> Gund, Paul Nicholson, Monte Marshall, Mary Bentsen, Jerry Finigan, Greg Calvert, <br /> Marcia Atwood, Brad Perkins, Karen Darling, Doris Traudt, Teresa Hanley, Rufus <br /> Hanley, Ken Carpenter, Mary Edgecomb, Ed Kashin, and Jan Wostmann. <br /> Ms. Ehrman said the council was surprised by the Neighborhood Leaders' resolution <br /> about urban renewal. She said the council invited the Neighborhood Leaders to <br /> this meeting to discuss their position on this and other issues, time permitting. <br /> Jan Wostmann made a brief statement on behalf of the Neighborhood Leaders. He <br /> said the group's resolution is not targeted at specific urban renewal projects but <br /> is based on the group.s general sentiment that the urban renewal program repre- <br /> sents a significant decision about how the City's resources are allocated over a <br /> long period of time and that it is appropriate for the voters to have input into <br /> how their tax money is allocated. Mr. Wostmann said the Neighborhood Leaders <br /> unanimously agreed that the council should refrain from incurring debts and <br /> pledging tax increment funds as payment without first gaining approval of the <br /> voters, and that voter approval should also be sought before the council expands <br /> current tax increment districts or creates new ones. Mr. Wostmann said this <br />e resolution represents the group's commitment to grass roots democracy. <br /> Ms. Schue asked if the Neighborhood Leaders are primarily concerned with the <br /> length of time that funds are pledged to urban renewal projects, or with the <br /> amount of funds that are committed. Mr. Wostmann said the committee is concerned <br /> with both. <br /> Mr. Marshall added that it has been more than 20 years since urban renewal was <br /> initially accepted by Eugene citizens; the Neighborhood Leaders Council believes <br /> that the citizens should be given a chance to vote on the issue again to determine <br /> if public opinion has changed. <br /> Mr. Calvert said the group is also concerned about the revenue impact of urban <br /> renewal in Eugene over the past three years and about the discretion given to <br /> council to choosing what projects to allow. Another concern is whether tax <br /> increment financing is being used for appropriate purposes. He said the law <br /> enabling urban renewal specifies that it be used as a tool for addressing urban <br /> blight. Mr. Calvert said the blight of some of the areas for which the council <br /> has approved tax increment financing is questionable. <br /> Mayor Miller said one of the issues raised by this discussion is whether Eugene <br /> should be run as a representative democracy or as a grass roots democracy. He <br /> said he places a lot of faith in representative democracy and feels it works very <br /> well. Mayor Miller said that in grass roots democracy, negativism and emotions <br /> often influence the outcome of an issue rather than the rationality. <br />e MINUTES--Eugene City Council September 25, 1989 Page 3 <br /> Dinner/Work Session <br />