Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />with its recommendation. The first comment was a recommendation that buses <br />leaving downtown for the University of Oregon and Lane Community College be <br />clearly marked with these destination points. The second comment dealt with <br />the concern that the focus of the proposed improvements was on the southwest <br />corner of the downtown area. Acknowledging this focus, the Planning Commission <br />had recommended that consideration be given in the near future for improving <br />service to employment centers located at the northeast end of the downtown <br />area as well. <br /> <br />Ms. Decker introduced Ellen Bevington of Lane Transit District. Ms. Bevington <br />displayed a schematic design of the proposed improvements, which called for <br />eliminating one of the traffic lanes on 10th Avenue, widening sidewalks, and <br />retaining one lane for bus parking. She said that this design would allow the <br />Transit District to arrange bus parking by neighborhood sector, with all the <br />buses going to a particular part of town leaving from the same area of the <br />transfer station. Ms. Bevington said that the improvements would also include <br />provision of bus shelters, improved lighting, and landscaping. <br /> <br />Councilor Obie noted that there had been discussion of reopening Willamette <br />Street to through traffic between 10th and 11th avenues. He asked if the <br />proposed layout would be compatible with this reopening. Ms. Bevington responded <br />that this would be compatible and would mean loss of one bus parking space, <br />which would not be a major problem. <br /> <br />Ms. Bevington said that the new layout would allow LTD to use color, number, and <br />symbol graphics to identify buses and loading sections. She felt that this <br />would make the routing system much easier for patrons to understand. <br /> <br />Councilor Hamel asked whether reducing the number of traffic lanes from three to <br />two would discourage traffic on 10th Avenue. Ms. Bevington responded that 10th <br />Avenue is currently used at well under capacity and that closing one lane should <br />not affect traffic flow. Mr. Hamel questioned whether additional sidewalk width <br />was needed along 10th Avenue. Ms. Bevington said that the Downtown Development <br />Board and downtown businesses feel that crowding on the sidewalk is a major <br />problem. <br /> <br />Councilor Wooten asked Ms. Bevington to explain the financing mechanisms for the <br />improvements. Ms. Bevington responded that the cost of the improvements is <br />estimated at $288,000. She said that the Eugene Renewal Agency will provide <br />$95,000, to be used primarily for improvements in the Overpark area and for <br />lighting and landscaping. LTD will contribute the remaining amount for sidewalk <br />improvements, bus shelters, graphics, and lighting and landscaping. In addition, <br />LTD will be funding construction of a customer service center. <br /> <br />Public hearing was opened. <br /> <br />Ken Kohnen, 2576 Brittania, represented the Board of Directors of the Lane <br />Transit District. He said that design and construction of a downtown transit <br />station had been under consideration for nearly ten years and that the district <br />estimated that $140,000 had been spent to date in consultant fees and staff time <br />in this work. He felt that the solution under consideration was reasonable and <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />May 19, 1982 <br /> <br />Page 4 <br />