Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />was distributed at the Planning Commission hearing and noted that the petition <br />included signatures of 100 percent of the residents of Roland Way. He said that <br />the main concern of neighbors was with traffic. He said there were already <br />problems with traffic backing up at the intersection of Gilham Road and Cal <br />Young Road. He stated the solution to traffic problems that Mr. Moulton <br />had referred to would include removing parking. He was upset that City staff <br />was making proposals for dealing with traffic problems caused by the Grocery <br />Cart before the rezoning was granted. He felt that parking removal would create <br />additional traffic safety problems in the area. Mr. Sellard said that convenience <br />stores were frequently targets of crime and would bring crime to the neighbor- <br />hood. He said lighting and signing would harm the aesthetics of the neighbor- <br />hood. He urged the council to uphold the decision of the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Robert F. Shelle~, 2122 Roland Way, concurred with Mr. Sellard's remarks. <br />He sa1d that durlng a discussion of the request at a meeting of the Cal Young <br />Neighborhood Association Mr. McCabe had said he would drop the rezoning request <br />if there were strong oppostion to the request from the neighborhood. <br />Mr. Shelley felt there was good evidence of such opposition. He was afraid that <br />this rezoning could be the beginning of commercial strip development in the <br />area. He was concerned with increased traffic and crime, littering, and intrusion <br />of lighting. He felt there was no need for the rezoning and urged the council <br />to deny the request. <br /> <br />George Grainger, 2114 Cal Young Road, said that he lived directly across from <br />the proposed market. He said that he had submitted comments on the matter to <br />the council in a letter dated November 12, 1982. He agreed with previous <br />testimony in opposition to the request. He asked councilors to vote on the <br />matter as they would if the proposed rezoning were located across the street <br />from their homes. <br /> <br />John M. Gogal, 2132 Cal Young Road, said he lived directly across from the <br />subject site. He concurred with remarks by previous speakers in opposition to <br />the request. He was afraid that approval of the request would be the beginning <br />of a spread of commercial development in the area. <br /> <br />Gordon W. Swan, 2160 Roland Way, concurred with previous speakers in opposition <br />to the request. He said Mr. McCabe had testified that there was a support <br />population of 2,000 for the proposed store, but he questioned whether this was <br />accurate if only 116 people had signed petitions in favor of the request. <br />Mr. Swan said that he had discussed his concerns about the spread of commercial <br />development in the area with a member of the Planning staff and that the staff <br />member had agreed that this could be a problem. He made a comparison with <br />commercial development along Coburg Road and said the Planning staff member <br />advised him that Coburg Road was not a planned commercial area but was zoned <br />with the same RA zoning as the subject area. <br /> <br />Dick Beers, 2185 Carmel, concurred with previous speakers in opposition <br />to the request. He was concerned with traffic problems that could result from <br />the requested zone change. He was also concerned that the property directly <br />east of the subject site might also seek and receive commercial zoning. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />MlNUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />January 24, 1983 <br /> <br />Page 3 <br />