Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- <br /> <br />a review of the rate structure in February 1985 and a final determination at <br />that point. Mr. Guenzler responded that a statutory review of the rate magni- <br />tude will occur in February 1985 and the memorandum suggests using that date to <br />study the magnitude and to commit the restructuring of the rate at that time. <br />Ms. Smith said the council was anticipating an earlier rate change. She sug- <br />gested that Mayor Keller convey that date to Mayor Lively as a compromise. <br /> <br />Mr. Hansen opposed the last suggestion of a date certain for the conversion to <br />flow-based rate, stating that he would rather look at the flow-based rate after <br />more information was available. <br /> <br />Ms. Schue said she had voted for the flow-based rate and that it was her percep- <br />tion that the negotiation would take some time. She said she is comfortable <br />with the early 1985 date but would also be willing to wait another six months <br />after that date to accommodate the City of Springfield. <br /> <br />Mr. Ball said he was not sure what else could be considered but the time frame <br />would allow consideration of any other option. He felt that enough facts are <br />al ready available. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Hansen said the council should restudy the issue as long as it has the <br />opportunity to gather additional data. He felt the issue is not certain <br />that the flow-based rate is the proper method. <br /> <br />Mr. Obie said the flow chart and the City Manager1s memorandum both show June <br />1985 as the conversion date. He asked if these dates were changed to February <br />1985. Mr. Ball said the conversion would start in February and be completed <br />in June. <br /> <br />Mr. Obie moved, seconded by Ms. Wooten, that the City Council ask <br />Mayor Keller to confer with Mayor Lively to offer the compromise <br />position and prepare a common policy resolution with the conversion <br />for sewer rate in June 1985. <br /> <br />Ms. Wooten said she agreed that the council must be generous and cooperative to <br />maintain the integrity of its position, but she asked that Mayor Keller confer <br />back with the council before negotiations reach any impasse. <br /> <br />Roll call vote; the motion carried unanimously, 7:0. <br /> <br />Mr. Gleason stated that he will schedule the meeting between Mayor Keller and <br />Mayor Lively. <br /> <br />v. FY83 FINANCIAL REPORT, AUDIT, AND CORRECTING RESOLUTION FOR THE URBAN <br />RENEWAL AGENCY (memo, resolution, background information distributed) <br /> <br />City Manager Micheal Gleason introduced the agenda item. Warren Wong of the <br />Finance Division presented the staff report on this and the subsequent agenda <br />item. He stated that the two reports provided to the council were for the Urban <br />Renewal Agency and for the City of Eugene. He reviewed his January 5, 1984, <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />January 25, 1984 <br /> <br />P ag e 5 <br />