Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Ball commented that the proposed level of involvement for the EPIC on an <br />annual basis reflects the changes in the legislation governing the new Job <br />Training Program, one of the intents of the legislation being to more greatly <br />involve the private sector. He said it has been interesting to observe the <br />private sector during the transition. He said the EPIC has picked up the intent <br />of the federal legislation at the local level. <br /> <br />John Porter of the Eugene Development Department stated that the major area for <br />the council will be the budget and long-range program recommendations, with much <br />of the mechanical work being performed by smaller committees within the EPIC. <br />Mr. Pryor, added that his observation has been that government agencies disburse <br />funds to the actual operating organizations, but they are rarely involved in the <br />planning process. He stated that Eugene is considered to be a model program due <br />to the relationship between the private and public sectors--one of the primary <br />reasons for the meeting. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. VanOrman asked what the council wanted to have in the manner of information <br />from the EPIC. In response to a question, Mr. VanOrman briefly explained the <br />role of the PARS (Performance Review) committee of the EPIC. Ms. Wooten stated <br />that she wanted to know what efforts were being made to coordinate the Job <br />Training Program with the needs of local industries and those relocating to the <br />Eugene area. She also asked how the program anticipated the needs of the <br />industries and how it responded to those needs. Mr. McIver felt that the <br />research study conducted by Marstat, with its evaluation of the EPIC and its <br />users, would be helpful in addressing that issue. He noted that the study was a <br />backward look and does not necessarily reflect the direction of the EPIC in the <br />future. He stated that the document includes vital information for the council, <br />including the reasoning behind the matrix currently proposed. <br /> <br />In response to a previous question on the Dislocated Worker Program, <br />Mr. Stephenson stated that he has worked with the program. He stated that <br />approximately 130 individuals are currently in the program, having already <br />placed 30 persons in positions with an average wage of $7.00 per hour. He said <br />the salary range is from $40,000 per year to the minimum wage level. <br /> <br />III. DISCUSSION OF SERVICE DELIVERY AREA (SDA) MERGER ACTIVITY <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor briefly desribed the potential merger of the present two SOAs into a <br />Metropolitan Eugene/Springfield portion and a balance of Lane County. He stated <br />that the EPIC discussed the City's objectives with representatives from the Lane <br />County program, stating that the members of the two PICs have achieved good <br />accord on agreements, desires and motivations to combine the two programs. In <br />addition, he stated that three formal meetings between the two PICs have been <br />held, both groups having discussed their own objectives from which a combined <br />list of objectives have been developed. He stated that he has discussed the <br />potential layout and design for the merger with Mr. Gleason and the need to <br />involve the City of Springfield. Also discussed were the concepts of incorpora- <br />tion and a 190 agreement. He stated that five of the eight SDAs in Oregon are <br />incorporated. He stated his desire to obtain feedback from the council on the <br />document for the proposed merger. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council/Private Industry Council <br />February 29. 1984 <br /> <br />Page 3 <br />