Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Ms. Schue pointed out that a study of the impacts on intersections of the <br />conversion should be done before the council considers the conversion. <br /> <br />Answering a question from Mr. Holmer, Mr. Lynch said the preliminary report <br />from the task force on the opening of Willamette Street and the design alter- <br />natives could be sent to councilors. <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Councilor Wooten, Mr. Lynch said councilors may <br />comment on the proposed design of Willamette Street to downtown commissioners <br />or to staff at any time. The project will cost about $400,000. Ms. Wooten <br />was concerned about the misunderstanding in the community regarding the <br />source of the funds for the project, noting that the general fund will not be <br />used. <br /> <br />Replying to a question from Ms. Bennett, Mr. Gleason said the CIP is a recom- <br />mendation about capital projects to the Budget Committee. The council will <br />act on the CIP in late February. A final decision on the budget is made in <br />July. <br /> <br />II. DOWNTOWN RETAIL DEVELOPMENT <br /> <br />Mr. Schwartz reviewed the history of downtown retail development projects. <br />He said the Downtown Commission had been working on the proposed Price Devel- <br />opment project for approximately two years. He introduced Lloyd LeBlanc, the <br />City's economic planning consultant on the project, who had submitted a <br />report titled "Markets & Services in Downtown Eugene" in October 1984. <br /> <br />Mr. LeBlanc reviewed his background, experience, and qualifications. He had <br />been asked to help define the potential for downtown if the 1976 policy to <br />increase downtown retail development and vitality was purusued. He noted <br />that retail potential could be between $50 million and $80 million and <br />between 3,500 and 5,500 new office employees in the next ten years if the <br />Eugene downtown received the same share of Lane County business it received <br />in the last ten years. He said the important things to consider in assessing <br />a development proposal are: Does it fit? Does it have market support? <br />And: What does the community have to do? <br /> <br />Mr. LeBlanc said the proposal from Price Development Company is reasonable. <br />The preliminary evaluation was carefully done and will undoubtedly be modi- <br />fied further, but it is worth pursuing. When a development agreement is <br />signed, the proposal will be more serious. The Downtown Plan will provide <br />guidance in evaluating the development proposal. Mr. LeBlanc hoped the City <br />would get ahead of the process, so the community can respond rapidly to the <br />proposal. The developers will want the City to provide parking improve- <br />ments. The development will substantially affect the activity level in the <br />downtown. <br /> <br />Answering a question from Councilor Hansen, Mr. LeBlanc said his forecasts <br />were based on statistics from L-COG and other local agencies. They assume <br />the downtown will maintain its share of growth. The downtown has suffered <br />from the perception that it is more costly andlor difficult to locate down- <br />town. The Downtown Plan, the resolution of the parking issue, actions of the <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council Work Session <br /> <br />February 11, 1985 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />at <br /> <br />e' <br /> <br />.~ <br />