Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Green supported developing standards for cleanliness. Mr. MacDonald <br />called for minimum safety and health regulations. Mr. Boles proposed carry- <br />ing out random interval inspections for cleanliness. <br /> <br />Ms. Utecht said that another change to the existing ordinance would be the <br />private right of action, which seeks to reduce enforcement not related to <br />health and safety. If, within 30 days of a complaint, the City has not ini- <br />tiated or indicated that it intends to take enforcement action, the complain- <br />ant could take legal action against the violator. <br /> <br />The council agreed with the main points of the ordinance revisions with the <br />addition of eliminating all restrictions on market entry. <br /> <br />In reply to a question from Mr. Boles, Ms. Utecht said that the current cost <br />of licensing does not meet last year's costs of administering the ordinance. <br />However, she believes that costs and license fees will balance next year. <br /> <br />Ms. Ehrman arrived. <br /> <br />B. WORK SESSION: WILLAKENZIE REFINEMENT PLAN <br /> <br />Allen Lowe, Planning and Development Department, explained that the <br />Willakenzie Area Plan is the result of more than three years of work by a <br />citizens advisory committee, staff, and metro area planning commissions. <br />Represented in the Willakenzie Area Plan are 25 individual Metro Plan amend- <br />ments, 21 individual TransPlan amendments, and 18 bicycle amendments. The <br />council will ultimately adopt the Willakenzie Plan as well as amendments on <br />all the plans. <br /> <br />The Willakenzie Planning Team (WPT) forwarded its recommendations on the plan <br />to the Eugene Planning Commission last August. The Planning Commission held <br />a joint public hearing in October and subsequently met six times to address <br />issues arising from the public hearing. While most of the WPT's recommenda- <br />tions remain intact, the Planning Commission has changed several of them. The <br />WPT continues to object to many of those changes. <br /> <br />The plan contains five elements: land use, transportation, public safety, <br />public facilities and services, and neighborhood design. <br /> <br />The WPT considers the key land use issue to be the application of minimum- <br />density standards. Although the Metro Plan calls for implementing minimum- <br />density standards, the City has not done so. This plan would set minimum <br />levels at 10 units per acre for medium-density and 15 units per acre for <br />high-density development. <br /> <br />Jim Croteau, Planning and Development Department, noted that the City of <br />Springfield has had minimum-density standards for several years. This is the <br />first plan that has proposed minimum-density standards in Eugene, Mr. Lowe <br />said, and that has caused some controversy. Although the Planning Commission <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br />5:30 p.m. <br /> <br />April 13, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br />