Laserfiche WebLink
<br />recommends code changes to apply the minimum-density standards citywide, he <br />~ added, those code changes are not part of this plan. <br /> <br />Mr. Boles asked how Willakenzie's present density compares to that of other <br />neighborhoods. Mr. Lowe responded that Willakenzie has the third-lowest <br />density of any neighborhood in the area and is less dense than any neighbor- <br />hood inside current city boundaries. <br /> <br />Transportation was a significant issue for the WPT, Mr. Lowe said. A 50-60 <br />percent increase in traffic volumes is expected. The TransPlan amendments <br />and policies attempt to maintain general mobility while minimizing negative <br />impacts of increased traffic. The Willakenzie Plan would create new major <br />streets in the area in order to plan development around them. Opposition has <br />arisen to proposed through streets, particularly a proposed continuous street <br />between Gilham Road and County Farm Road. <br /> <br />Mr. Robinette said that it is his understanding that the Lane Transit Dis- <br />trict (LTD) desires the through street for buses, and there are mechanisms to <br />restrict through access to buses. Mr. Lowe confirmed that. The through <br />street would allow public transit to pass through medium-density, multi-fami- <br />ly areas in order to increase ridership. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Nicholson felt that Willakenzie residents, who are already on the periph- <br />ery, bear a small percentage of the traffic that they themselves create. Mr. <br />Boles said that the collector in contention is in a relatively undeveloped <br />area, currently outside the city limits. He asked whether development should <br />follow transportation planning or the reverse, and saw an opportunity to <br />address that issue. <br /> <br />Mr. Robinette said the main issue is proximity of the new street to an ele- <br />mentary school. Mr. Lowe responded that the school would be separated from <br />the street by new development. <br /> <br />Mr. Lowe discussed the public safety aspect of the plan. The emphasis is on <br />improving emergency response time, since much of the area cannot presently be <br />served within four minutes. The plan proposes developing a public safety <br />station, with interim use of the existing station. <br /> <br />Ms. Bascom suggested cooperation with facilities in the Gateway area. Mr. <br />Lowe said that while such service exchanges occur presently, as Willakenzie <br />develops, they will become inadequate. Mr. Boles said that the Metropolitan <br />Policy Committee (MPC) is interested in joint fire station jurisdiction to <br />meet needs in both Willakenzie and Gateway. Mr. Lowe explained that the <br />public safety station, as proposed in the plan, would be a combined police, <br />fire, and emerg~ncy medical services station. <br /> <br />Mr. Green asked about the costs associated with the new station, and Mr. Lowe <br />replied that none were included in the information available. Mr. Gleason <br />said a master plan analysis of existing and proposed stations was made by the <br />Lane Council of Governments (L-COG) at the request of the Budget Committee. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br />5:30 p.m. <br /> <br />April 13, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 3 <br />