Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Bob Belding, 474 Pinto Way, is opposed to action increasing density in <br /> subdi vis ions. <br />-e Eugene Emge, 2181 Washington, feels that passage of the proposal would <br /> not maintain the character and quality of older neighborhoods or the <br /> esthetics of the city. <br /> Public hearing was closed. <br /> Mr. Saul said that, should Council wish to refer for further consider- <br /> ation, it would be appropriately referred to the Joint Housing Committee. <br /> Mr. Murray asked for staff response on the following points: 1. Pro- <br /> posed amendment would have unfair impact with lots of vacant land. 2. <br /> Amendment would have negative impact in terms of protecting existing <br /> housing-tearing down and re-constructing. 3. Tax impact on surrounding <br /> lots. 4. Issue of site review procedures. 5. Suggestion in Bonnett <br /> letter on considering provision that the land be vacant' for several years <br /> before construction be allowed on it. <br /> Mrs. Beal wanted information on the following point: Difference in cost <br /> between duplex and single-family housing - what difference in land cost <br /> would amount to. In other words, would cheaper housing really be created. <br /> Mr. Bradley asked the following points: 1. Is this the appropriate timing <br /> for implementing this land use control. Whole question of timing in re- <br /> lation to 1990 Plan. 2. How does this promote urban growth if density <br />e remains the same - and 3. hwo does that priority balance against the pri- <br /> ority of preserving single-family dwellings. <br /> Mrs. Shirey wants to know: 1. Wants new land we have annexed brought in- <br /> to these figures somehow. 2. Comments also re: proceeding with caution <br /> and feeling people already living here must be considered. <br /> Mr. Williams felt that referring the matter to the Joint Housing Committee <br /> bears serious consideration. The Committee has been more involved in that <br /> type of question but more importantly that body has developed a history of <br /> being a pretty thoughtful group of people who have time to look at the <br /> questions. <br /> Mrs. Shirey moved, seconded by Mr. Haws, that staff and the Joint <br /> Housing Committee come back with a report in December if possible. <br /> Mr. Bradley amended the motion, seconded by Mr. Murray, to set a <br /> date of the 13th of December. <br /> Vote was taken on the amendment which carried, Mr. Hamel, Mrs. Beal, <br /> Mr. Murray, Mr. Bradley, Mrs. Shirey, voting aye and Mr. Haws and <br /> Mr. Williams voting nay. <br /> Vote was taken on the original motion which carried unanimously. <br />D. Appeal from Sign Code Board of Appeals action with respect t~ sign for <br />,_ Valley River Twin Cinema. 1077 Valley River Drive (Moyer Theatres) - <br /> Staff appeal plus cross-appeal filed by Moyer Theatres <br /> Postponement to November 22 Council meeting requested by sign owner. <br /> Mr. Haws moved, seconded by Mrs. Beal, to postpone to No mb 22 <br /> M t' . . ve er . <br /> o lon carrled unanlmously. . <br /> 53CJ Minutes 11/8/76 -3 <br />