Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> --. - <br /> Mr. Lieuallen wondered, assuming that a certain amount of prostitution <br /> goes on that is not visible on the streets, whether the same kind <br /> of crimi nal acti vi ty W*iS associated wi th that. Chief Brooks repli ed e <br /> yes, but in considerably less amounts. He said where prostitution <br /> is controlled, it reduces the prostitution problem by 75 percent <br /> or more, getting to a size more easily controlled. <br /> Mr. Delay said the prostitution ordinance had been discussed several <br /> times, with the potential for abuse seeming to be the main con- <br /> cern. Chief Brooks had indicated he would establish proper pro- <br /> cedures to eliminate possible harassment and selective abuse. Mr. <br /> Delay wondered if, in fact, such procedural guidelines are good <br /> police practices, whether those guidelines could be accommodated by <br /> tightening the language and adding procedural guidelines to the <br /> ordinance. Chief Brooks said he would prefer to set up procedures <br /> immediately and wondered about writing procedures into the law. He <br /> said the established procedures would be reviewed by the Prosecutors <br /> Office, the City Manager, and the Council. He noted also that all <br /> information coming to the Police Department from citizens or other <br /> groups would go to a unit that would monitor the prostitution problem. <br /> Mr. Delay said his real concern was a question of whether or not <br /> Chief Brooks could be comfortable with tighter procedural wording <br /> in the ordinance, if that were possible. Chief Brooks said he would <br /> have to see the language and then discuss it with the prosecuter <br /> before he could give a concrete answer. Mr. Delay then asked the <br /> City Attorney if it were possible to accommodate in the ordinance the <br /> areas in which there might definitely be a problem, i.e~, the poten- e <br /> tial for abuse. He wondered if it might be possible to do a better <br /> job of more accurately defining what would be meant by "repeated" or <br /> engaging in soliciting. Mr. Long replied there was evidently an <br /> assumption that the present ordinance is in some respects not effec- <br /> tive. He reiterated the previously made statements of claims of a <br /> ordinance being arbitrarily enforced as being old claims. He noted, <br /> again, the Portland prostitution ordinance had been dealt with in <br /> courts and upheld as being legal, constitutional, and not unduly <br /> susceptible to being arbitrarily enforced. He also noted if it were <br /> abused, there were consequences within the Police Department to deal <br /> with police officers. Mr. Delay said he understood the language as <br /> meeting the minimum standards of testability for vagueness. He <br /> wondered, however, if the City Attorney felt more restrictive language <br /> could be accommodated without much difficulty. Mr. Long replied with <br /> a qualified yes, noting more restrictive language would possibly mean <br /> that the ordinance would be less effective. <br /> C. B. 1548--Concerning prostitution; amending Section 4.745 of City <br /> Code 1971, and declaring an emergency, was read by council <br /> bill number and title only, there being no Council member <br /> present requesting that it be read in full. <br /> e <br /> 10/10/77--4 <br /> -,,,1.., <br />