Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> plan to the year 2000. Those conceptual goals became the assumptions <br />e on which the staff based its transportation plan. He said the plan <br /> would address the transportation needs up to the year 2000. The urban <br /> area in its entirety, and in particular the city, has a strong com- <br /> mi tment to greatly increased alt.ernat.i\te methods of transportati on <br /> other than the automobile. The str?et~ Q:~d hi gh'filay improvements woul d <br /> be considered to prevent intolerable s;'.,'eet congestion (a goal to <br /> strive for a tolerable level of servic2~. <br /> He reviewed the four major plan ehsents. The policies plan could be the <br /> most important, as it contains a multitude of recommended actions to bring <br /> about goals the City Council has set for alter'natives and load service. <br /> He said the transit, streets; and highways elements took the major part <br /> of time, as more technical ~~IOi'~~ ami in..depth analyzation of alternatives <br /> were. requi red. The transit element studied systems ranging from ex- <br /> isting systems, such as adding more buses, to exotic techniques. The <br /> recommendation arrived at was a bus rapid transit system, and he said <br /> this would be more detailed in the document Council would receive in <br /> two weeks. The streets and highway element was directed at versus cor- <br /> ridors in the urban area where there would be serious traffic overloads. <br /> Many alternatives were studied to relieving those overloads. He sai d the <br /> year 2000 target date presented some difficulties, but the summary would <br /> list the major facilities which were felt to be needed by 2000. However, <br /> he noted between now and 1990, because of lack of funds and unknown energy <br /> supply, staff ~Jas recommendi ng tryi ng to meet the goal s by improvi ng <br /> existing systems (i.e., adding to the transit system and bus routes). In <br /> regard to the financing element, Mr. Reinhard sai(~ this was a very criti- <br />e cal area, as all levels of government were facing some funding constraints <br /> that could make other issues academic. He felt the fin3ncing element <br /> would have to be brought in at a very early point. <br /> Other elements in the plan were pedestrians, parking, paratransit, and <br /> bicycles. He said an additional item was inter-city transit element <br /> (Willamette Valley). All policy elements are dealing with the goals of <br /> trying to improve these methods of travel. He said t.here would be some <br /> recommendations to siting of downtown terminals for inter-city transit, <br /> and strong participation of the local governments with the state in its <br /> planning would be encouraged. <br /> Mr. Obie had strong feelings regarding the summQry and wanted to know when <br /> the opportune time was to express those feelings. He did not want to wait <br /> until the process and planning had gone to such a point that such input <br /> would not be useful. Mr. Farah sai d there \'/ere two early poi nts for <br /> input: 1) the meeti ngs between No'!ember and January for di scussion <br /> and input from neighborhood groups; and, more importantly 2) the possi- <br /> bility of holding Council workshops at any time. <br /> Mr. Delay noted when reviewing the growth projections for the last <br /> five years for the 1990 Plan Update, there were two major errors: the <br /> natural growth was over-estimated, and migration under-estimated. He <br />e <br /> 10/12/77 --5 <br /> ,11 <br />