Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />Allen Wagner, Dial-A-Cab Company, said the cab operators are disturbed <br />about the requirement to run top lights in the day when no one can see <br />them anyway. He feels it would be a strain on the cab's battery. His <br />other major concern is that the ordinance contains an emergency clause, <br />meaning that if passed "today" all cabs would have to be pulled off the <br />street until the appropriate changes are made. Manager noted that the <br />emergency clause could be deleted in which case the ordinance would become <br />effective in 30 days. Staff also responded that the reason for the light <br />on the top of the cab is to show the cab's availability for service. Mrs. <br />Smith wondered if it would be appropriate to have that light on while a <br />cab is in motion and available but let the light be turned off when it is <br />parked at a taxi stand, and obviously available. <br /> <br />Mr. Williams said he isn't convinced that a case has been made that <br />the City should tell the cab companies whether they must have lights. <br />Mrs. Smith said she supports the ordinance with the exception of the <br />light requirement. Mr. Keller noted that the intent of the ordinance <br />is to deregulate, and he wonders how dere9ulating could include a require- <br />ment that a driver not be allowed to smoke. On page 12 of the ordinance, <br />Mr. Bradley wondered about the taxicab driver being allowed to cruise in <br />public ways and places soliciting passengers for hire. Finance Director <br />said that recommendation was made to provide more flexibility and to <br />supplement other forms of transportation available. Mr. Bradley then <br />wondered about allowing the drivers to stop on private property when <br />permitted by the person in charge thereof. He wondered what would prevent <br />a large hotel, for example, to give exclusive franchise to one company to <br />park on their property to the exclusion of other cab companies. City <br />Attorney responded that that could happen under the proposed language. <br />Council could decide whether to research that further. Mr. Bradley said <br />Council should be very careful because the whole proposal will greatly <br />affect the consumer. Mr. Delay said that, if it creates problems, and cab <br />drivers try to increase their rates too much, Council can look again at <br />the matter. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Obie moved, seconded by Mr. Bradley, to adopt the ordi- <br />nance with amendments eliminating the requirement for a light <br />on top and eliminating the emergency clause. Motion carried, <br />all Council members voting aye except Mr. Bradley and Mr. Haws <br />voting no. <br /> <br />C.B. 1609 regarding taxicabs; amending Sections 3.005, 3.010, 3.535, <br />3.355, 3.360, 3.365, 3.375, 3.380, 3.385, 3.390, 3.405, <br />3.410, and 3.415 of Code, 1971; repealing Sections 3.370 and <br />3.420; adding new Sections 3.363, 3.380, 3.383, 3.391, and <br />3.392; and declaring an emergency was read the first time by <br />Council bill number and title only, there being no Council <br />members present requesting that it be read in full. <br /> <br />Mr. Hamel moved seconded by Mrs. Smith that the bill be read the <br />second time by Council bill number only, with unanimous consent <br />of the Council, and that enactment be considered at this time. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />2/22178 - 3 <br /> <br />, 18 <br />