Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br />B. Appeal of Planning Commission Action to Uphold Planning Director's <br />e Approval for Tentative Subdivision for Property Located on the West <br /> Slope of Laurel Hill Valley Having Frontage Along Riverview Drive <br /> and Bristol Avenue (East Slope Subdivision) (S 79-15) (map distributed) <br /> Denied by Planning Commission October 22, 1979. Vote 7:0 <br /> Mr. Saul, Planner, said that the two tax lots are some 650 feet in <br /> depth. Approval of the subdivision would result in the creation of 13 <br /> lots of this three-plus acre site. The appeal before the Planning <br /> Commission alleged that the subdivision should be denied because it <br /> was not appropriate in laurel Hill Valley. There was particular <br /> emphasis on the requirement for additional dedication and an improve- <br /> ment petition on Bristol Avenue. The Planning Commission did unani- <br /> mously deny the appeal and both the original findings and the minutes <br /> were distributed to the Council. The present appeal requests that <br /> Bristol Avenue be maintained at the present 30-foot right-of-way. Mr. <br /> Saul indicated that Bristol Avenue is designated as a residential <br /> street with a 50-foot right-of-way. That designation was adopted by <br /> City Council in 1968 by ordinance. <br /> Ms. Miller wanted to know the implications of the extra right-of-way <br /> and the improvement petition, whether it will immediately lead to <br /> further paving. Mr. Saul responded that the Bristol Avenue right-of- <br /> way of 30 feet was established a number of years ago when the property <br /> was in the County. The City, if development occurs, would require <br /> dedication of the additional right-of-way to bring it to a total <br /> right-of-way width of 50 feet. It would be a gradual process as <br />e properties develop and the City would not initiate any action until <br /> there were petitions for at least 50 percent of the affected frontage. <br /> In those instances where right-of-way had been acquired through dedi- <br /> cation, there would be no purchase by the City. In other instances, <br /> and assuming the City wished to acquire additional right-of-way, it <br /> would have to enter into negotiations and actually purchase from the <br /> other owners. Before the City can approve a subdivision or minor <br /> partition, it is required to make a written finding either that the <br /> street providing certain access is already improved to standards, or <br /> that a petition has been submitted. <br /> No ex parte contacts or conflicts of interest were expressed by <br /> councilors. <br /> Staff notes and minutes were entered into the record. <br /> Public hearing was opened. <br /> Jim Bartell, 2265 Floral Hill Drive, said his property is adjacent <br /> to and abuts Bristol Avenue. He said there seems to be a unanimity <br /> among residents that Bristol should be kept at 30 feet wide. The <br /> majority of people have property fronting on Bristol. The feeling <br /> is that Bristol is more of an alley and the residents see Floral Hill <br /> as the primary usage street. <br />e <br /> 11/26/79--3 <br /> 6ZQ <br />