Laserfiche WebLink
<br />(e <br /> <br />G. <br /> <br />Agenda Adjustment <br /> <br />Mayor Keller stated that, in regard to Item VIII on the agenda, <br />Amendment of Trespass Ordinance, there were a number of people <br />ready to testify on this item. He said the councilors might want <br />to take a look at this item and perhaps hold it over for a public <br />hearing. <br /> <br />Gretchen Miller moved, seconded by Scott Lieuallen, to hold <br />this item over until April 28 for a public hearing with the staff <br />presentation to be made today, and that this item follow agenda <br />Item II, Consortium/Prime S onsor Options. (Date of public <br />hearing later changed to May 12, 980. <br /> <br />Mr. Delay stated he would like a preliminary staff report at the <br />meeting today, followed by a public hearing on April 28. Mr. Haws <br />and Ms. Miller agreed. <br /> <br />Roll call vote; motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />H. League of Oregon Cities Regional Conference <br /> <br />Mr. Allen stated they are still seeking council registrants for the <br />League of Oregon Cities April 15 Regional Conference. If any coun- <br />cilors are planning to attend, they should advise the City Manager's <br />Office. <br /> <br />ce <br /> <br />II. CONSORTIUM/PRIME SPONSOR OPTIONS--COUNCIL DISCUSSION (memo distributed) <br /> <br />\e <br /> <br />Mr. Allen stated that the council had approved staff recommendations in <br />concept at a previous meeting and staff had completed the necessary <br />follow-up work. He indicated that Lane County Commissioner Otto t'Hooft <br />would be making a presentation. <br /> <br />Lane County Commission Chairman t'Hooft, 83011 Clayton Road, thanked the <br />council for inviting him to speak. He stated he would be speaking for <br />the Lane County Board of Commissioners. They would like the City to <br />consider the consequences of separate CETA administrative roles as to <br />whether these actions will produce the best client services. The County <br />is not asking the City to participate in a program not supported by the <br />City. He asked if the actions leading to duplication of effort in sep- <br />arate programs would provide the best client service. Convenience to <br />staff, either City or County, must not be the primary basis for the <br />action. <br /> <br />On April 1, 1980, Lane County decided it could not support two Prime <br />Sponsor programs. He said the County would like to see a single consor- <br />tium with a single operation or to continue in the present prime sponsor/ <br />program agent format. The de 1 i very serv i ce to c 1 i ent s must be the pr imar y <br />consideration. Duplicate administration would cause a financial loss to <br />the clients who need the services. CETA is a training program, and every <br /> <br />4/2/80--3 <br />