Laserfiche WebLink
Mark Johnson, 1320 Inglewood Street, identified himself as an employee of Lane Transit District and <br />spoke of the effect of the DPSZ on LTD's Eugene Station operations. He supported the extension of the <br />DPSZ until the officers in training now were on the street. He thought the DPSZ was a great safety valve <br />that the police had used well. <br />Thomas Kamis, 94 West Broadway, a downtown business owner, recommended the extension of the <br />DPSZ as another tool for the police. He questioned where those who opposed the zone had been when the <br />City established a prostitution -free zone. He believed the DPSZ was effective in helping to eliminate <br />repeat offenders from downtown. Mr. Kamis shared a quote from a nationally broadcast cartoon that <br />implied Eugene contained a large hobo jungle. <br />Eugene Drix, 307 -1/2 14` Avenue, supported trying out the DPSZ given the development occurring <br />downtown, which would bring more people to downtown. <br />David Hauser, 2168 Elkhorn Drive, representing Downtown Eugene, Inc, thanked the council, Police <br />Commission, and City staff for their thoughtful evaluation of the DPSZ. He thought it important not to <br />overstate the importance of the zone, which was one of many needed tools to create a downtown where all <br />were welcome. It replaced an incarceration option that was not available now, and could displace chronic <br />violators from downtown. The DPSZ had been implemented responsibly and no complaints had been <br />made to the Police Auditor. Mr. Hauser thought the sunset clause made sense as it built a bridge to <br />increased police capacity to downtown. He acknowledged the DPSZ was not the perfect solution, but that <br />solution did not yet exist. <br />Laura Potter, 1401 Willamette Street, representing the Eugene Area Chamber of Commerce, said the <br />DPSZ was an important element in public safety downtown. The zone was designed to provide an <br />alternative to incarceration by displacing chronic violators from downtown. She agreed with Mr. Hauser <br />that the Eugene Police Department had used the tool responsibly. She asked that the ordinance be <br />extended until more officers were available to work downtown. <br />Jim Welsh, 2139 Centennial Plaza, representing the Eugene Association of Realtors, supported the <br />extension of the ordinance as proposed and the addition of sexual offenses to the list of offenses for which <br />one could be excluded. He said the exclusion zone had improved public safety downtown. He expressed <br />appreciation to the council and Eugene Police Chief Pete Kerns for listening to all residents' concerns. <br />He said his association believed the ordinance was important to the community and downtown. <br />Mayor Piercy closed the public hearing and solicited council questions and comments. <br />Councilor Zelenka thanked those who offered testimony. He said the exclusion zone had been used 93 <br />times in the last two years and only two actual crimes were involved. The majority of exclusions were for <br />alcohol violations and trespass. While criminal activity downtown had decreased, criminal activity in <br />nearby neighborhoods had increased, so the City had not stopped the behavior involved, it had merely <br />moved it. Councilor Zelenka was struck by the fact that 65 percent of those excluded were low- income <br />homeless people. He noted that the pre- hearing exclusions occurred before a person went to a judge, and <br />requested that staff prepare two amendments to the ordinance, the first to eliminate the pre- hearing <br />exclusion, and the second to provide advocacy for those coming before a judge for the 90 -day exclusion. <br />Councilor Taylor was opposed to the DPSZ but supported Councilor Zelenka's amendments if the zone <br />was to be renewed. <br />MINUTES — Eugene City Council November 22, 2010 Page 2 <br />Regular Meeting <br />