Laserfiche WebLink
Metro Plan Chapter IV Amendments <br />Staff Report and Findings <br />October 15, 2013 <br />Applicants: <br />City of Springfield (initiated the amendment) <br />City of Eugene <br />Lane County <br />Local File Numbers: <br />Springfield File No. TYP411 -0001 <br />Eugene File No. MA 13 -3 <br />Lane County File No. 509 -PA13 -05171 <br />Request: <br />ProcedureType: <br />To amend Chapter IV of the Eugene - Springfield <br />Type I Metro Plan Amendment <br />Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan) to reflect the <br />establishment of separate Urban Growth Boundaries as <br />required by Oregon Revised Statute 197.304 <br />Attachments: <br />Attachment 1: Proposed Metro Plan Chapter IV Amendments. <br />Attachment 2: Chart Comparing Current and Proposed Standards for Metro Plan Chapter IV. <br />I. Executive Summary <br />The goal of Metro Plan Chapter IV (titled Metro Plan Review, Amendments and Refinements) is to <br />"ensure that the Metro Plan is responsive to the changing conditions, needs, and attitudes of the <br />community." ORS 197.304 (HB 3337) required the establishment of separate Urban Growth Boundaries <br />(UGBs) for Eugene and Springfield and was the impetus for the Springfield 2030 Refinement Plan and the <br />Envision Eugene planning initiatives. As these planning efforts are readied for adoption, amendments to <br />Chapter IV are necessary to make the Metro Plan consistent with the statute and to clarify which <br />governing bodies will participate in decision making. The amendments to Chapter IV are intended to <br />support a framework for needed planning collaboration among the jurisdictions while respecting the <br />autonomy of each. <br />The most significant changes to Chapter IV of the Metro Plan are summarized below. <br />Three types of Metro Plan amendments are established by the number of jurisdictions required <br />to approve the proposed amendment: Type I amendments require the participation of all three <br />jurisdictions; Type II requires the participation of the home city and Lane County; and Type III <br />amendments may be enacted by the home city alone. The current policy defines only two types <br />of amendments: Types I and H. <br />Currently, all three governing bodies must approve a site specific UGB or Metro Plan Boundary <br />adjustments that cross the Willamette or McKenzie Rivers or that cross over a ridge into a new <br />basin. The proposed amendments would instead require all three governing bodies approve <br />only the amendments of the common UGB along 1 -5 and for UGB or Metro Plan Boundary <br />amendments that cross 1 -5.The proposed amendments remove references to Metro Plan <br />amendments with "regional impact." Removal of the regional impact language does not impact <br />similar language that is found in Chapter VI of the Eugene - Springfield Metropolitan Area Public <br />Facilities and Services Plan (Public Facilities Plan) which provides for multi - jurisdictional review <br />of public facility projects which have a significant impact on water, stormwater, wastewater and <br />Metro Plan Chapter IV Amendments TYP411 -00001 Exhibit A <br />October 15, 2013 Page 1 <br />