Laserfiche WebLink
2004 <br /> <br /> · Staff evaluation and report to the commission <br /> <br /> · Planning Commission action on October 25, 2004 <br /> <br />Mr. Belcher asked if the 120-day rule had been waived. Mr. Nystrom replied that there was a previous <br />extension from the applicant. Mr. Terrell said that the applicant would be willing to issue another <br />extension if necessary. <br /> <br /> Ms. McMillan moved, seconded by Ms. Levis, to leave the record open <br /> until the end of the business day on September 21, 2004, followed by a <br /> one-week period for public response that would close on September 28, <br /> 2004, a subsequent one-week period for applicant response that would <br /> close on October 5, 2004, and commission action on October 25, 2004. <br /> The motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Mr. Nystrom asked the commission to identify for staff any questions or issues that the parties should <br />focus on. <br /> <br />Mr. Lawless encouraged the applicant and neighborhood to cooperate and compromise by retaining the <br />goodwill intent of the neighborhood refinement plan while recognizing the realities of the subject site <br />and other major land use goals within the urban growth boundary. <br /> <br />Mr. Rusch asked for more detailed responses to the traffic concerns expressed by ODOT. <br /> <br />MINUTES - Eugene Planning Commission September 14, 2004 Page 12 <br />Public Hearing <br /> <br /> 11/-102 <br /> <br /> <br />