Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Levis said the key issue was how to define public need for the application and the need for more <br />significant findings. <br /> <br />Mr. Belcher encouraged staff to work with the neighborhood association to help them understand the <br />process related to Metro Plan housekeeping measures. <br /> <br />Mr. Duncan asked for a discussion of the mix of commercial uses oriented to tourists and to residents and <br />how various properties might be more oriented to the neighborhood or tourist uses. <br /> <br />Mr. Belcher asked for information on the City's position regarding the development of 25th Street. <br /> <br />Ms. McMillan said it would be helpful to have more information on other commercial properties and any <br />development constraints that might exist. <br /> <br />Ms. Colbath asked about gravity flow and whether commercial build out such as a hotel would be <br />accommodated through the orderly extension of services. Mr. Nystrom said the issue had been addressed <br />in the staff report and the findings were that such development could be accommodated. <br /> <br />Mr. Lawless closed the public hearing at 7:18 p.m. <br /> <br />(Recorded by Lynn Taylor) <br /> <br />MINUTES - Eugene Planning Commission September 14, 2004 Page 13 <br />Public Hearing <br /> <br /> IV-103 <br /> <br /> <br />