Laserfiche WebLink
Refinement Plan Amendment - TRS 18-03-03-2-3, Tax Lots 199, 200, 300 <br /> January 13, 2004 <br /> Page 13 <br /> <br /> {Policy) Implement housing programs that provide housing opportunities for all <br /> metropolitan area residents without discrimination. (III-A-5) <br /> <br /> Findings: As repeatedly noted above, the Applicants have been advised that residential <br />development of the subject property is not feasible. The only type of residential development <br />that might be able to attract residents at this site would be extremely low-cost housing in the <br />form of a trailer or mobile home park. Even then, given the proximity to the high-power <br />electrical lines, the cost of the housing would have to be so low as to likely not be economically <br />feasible. <br /> <br /> While at first glance it would appear that such an approach-a low-cost mobile home <br />park-could possibly be feasible, the Applicants are also concerned about legitimate <br />environmental justice issues that would arise from locating a low-cost mobile home park in <br />between two sets of high-voltage power lines. Development of housing at this location would <br />raise issues of discrimination against lower-income residents contrary to this Metro Plan policy. <br />Amending the plan designation as proposed here would alleviate those concems of violating this <br />policy. <br /> <br /> Conclusion: The proposal is consistent with this Metro Plan provision. <br /> <br /> (Policy) Encourage a mixture of dwelling unit types in appropriate areas. OII-A-6) <br /> <br /> Findings: This policy, in part, examines the appropriateness of sites for residential uses. <br />As described above, the subject property is not an appropriate area for residential uses. The <br />power line easement areas of the property are unbuildable for residential use. The remaining <br />portion of the subject property, sandwiched between the power lines is not an appropriate area to <br />locate dwellings from an environmental justice perspective. While the proposal does not provide <br />for dwelling units on the subject property, it furthers this policy by recognizing that residential <br />use of the subject property is not appropriate. <br /> <br /> Conclusion: The proposal is consistent with this Metro Plan provision. <br /> <br /> (Ob|eetive) Shape and plan for a compact urban growth form to provide for growth <br /> while preserving the special character of the metropolitan area. (II-B-3) <br /> <br /> Findings: The prOposal promotes the development of compact urban growth by <br />converting a difficult, in-fill type site from vacant residential to productive commercial use. The <br />proximity of the site to the commercial/residential node will help preserve the special character <br />of the Laurel Hill area by locating this commercial use adjacent to other commercial uses with <br />minimal to no impacts to the residential uses in the Laurel Hill Valley or the southern portions of <br />the East Laurel Hill Area, both of which are geographically separated from the subject property. <br /> <br /> Conclusion: The proposal is consistent with this Metro Plan provision. <br /> <br /> II-B-13 <br /> <br /> <br />