My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 5 - PH on Laurel Hill Plan
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-11/08/04Mtg
>
Item 5 - PH on Laurel Hill Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:47:57 PM
Creation date
11/4/2004 8:59:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
11/8/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
474
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
which includes the subject site. The policies identified below from the Laurel Hill <br />Refinement Plan, are relevant to this request. <br /> <br />Land Use and Future Urban Design <br /> <br /> Policy #5: <br /> No additional sector of East Laurel Hill shall be designated for commercial <br /> purposes until a public need can be demonstrated. <br /> <br />There are several identifiable public needs that lead to the conclusion that this policy is <br />satisfied. At a fundamental level, the applicants have identified the public need for <br />property to be developable under the land use designations given to that property. <br />Applicants have demonstrated that the site is unsuitable for and unbuildable for <br />residential uses. Buildable lands, when appropriately designated, are necessary for <br />effective land use planning. <br /> <br />Applicants have also identified a public need for additional commercial designated <br />properties in the Laurel Hill area arising from recent changes to the Eugene Code. The <br />recently amended Eugene Code has increased the allowed density for R-1 zoned areas <br />from approximately 10 units per acre to a maximum of 14 units per acre, a 40 percent <br />increase in allowed density. East Ridge Village, now under development, approaches <br />that maximum density of 14 units per acre. Other proposals for residential development <br />in the area reflect a similar increase in residential density. That increase in residential <br />population creates a need for additional commercial designated property in the Laurel <br />Hill area to provide adequate services. The site, with its proximity to the Glenwood <br />Interchange, to the commercial node, and on the fringe of the residential areas is ideally <br />suited to provide commercial services to Laurel Hill residents, residents of other nearby <br />residential areas, and to tourists in a manner that the Laurel Hill Plan indicates is <br />appropriate for the commercial node. <br /> <br /> Development plans, adopted after the adoption of the Laurel Hill Plan, have also created <br /> a public need for additional commercial designated areas. Approval of the Son Blaze <br /> Village (now East Ridge Village) PUDs required an extensive re-design of the I-5 <br /> Glenwood interchange beyond what was anticipated in the Laurel Hill Plan. That re- <br /> design moved the Moon Mountain Drive-Glenwood Boulevard-Glenwood Drive- <br /> Brackenfem Road intersection into areas designated for commercial development. <br /> Furthermore, the realignment of Glenwood Drive and the wider Brackenfem Road have <br /> further debited from developable commercial designated property, which needs to be <br /> replaced. <br /> <br /> Topographic characteristics of the area also lead to a public need for immediately <br /> available commercial lands. Topographic maps and photographs in the record show that <br /> much of the commercial node is located in a topographic depression to the east of <br /> Brackenfem Road. Development of those parcels are contingent upon not only the <br /> construction of Brackenfem Road, but on the resolution of sewer and storm water <br /> challenges arising from the geography of those locations. Those sites will not be <br /> <br /> IV-66 <br /> <br /> Page 10 of 12: Proposed Findings for Laurel Hill Plan Amendment (RA 04-1) <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.