Laserfiche WebLink
Freight Route Analysis Project (FRAP) <br /> Staff Report <br /> September 1, 2004 <br /> <br />I. Introduction <br /> <br />The staff report below is in response to a request the Oregon Transportation Commission (OTC) made at <br />its January 2004 Commission meeting. At that meeting, the OTC approved the changes to Policy lB of <br />the 1999 Oregon Highway Plan (OHP). The key components of this revision were to simplify the <br />highway segment designation process by recognizing existing characteristics and requiring written local <br />government support prior to the designations. It was during this process working with a variety of <br />stakeholders that concern was expressed about the impact of these and future highway segment <br />designations on freight routes. Both the stakeholders and the OTC felt that with the revisions to the lB <br />policy it was also appropriate to evaluate both the actual designations of the freight routes and the <br />methodology that was used to determine their designation. <br /> <br />As part of that effort, an advisory committee was formed to participate in the discussion and designation <br />of new freight routes on state highways. Freight Route Analysis Project (FRAP) committee members <br />include representation from the Oregon Trucking Associations, local government, a Metropolitan <br />Planning Organization (MPO), Freight Advisory Committee, an Area Commission on Transportation <br />member, a port representative, Department of Land Conservation and Development, Association of <br />Oregon Counties, Federal Highway Administration, League of Oregon Cities, and the Retail Task Force. <br />This led to a series of meetings with the committee. As part of their recommendations they provided <br />input on what might need to be considered in designating freight routes. Through these discussions, <br />members also advanced routes to be considered for designation beyond those recommended by staff. <br /> <br />The report below summarizes the work to date with recommended changes to both freight route <br />designations and associated OHP policies. The staff report highlights information from the current OHP <br />as it relates to freight policy and definition. It also summarizes the methodology used in that process. <br />The information following that discussion highlights the significance of the freight designation to other <br />aspects of transportation, such as planning and highway design issues. The report then discusses the <br />criteria and factors that were used in the evaluation of the additional freight routes being proposed. The <br />revisions, both to the analytical work and the designations, require amending the language of the freight <br />policies. The proposed policy changes are highlighted in Section VI of the report. Finally, there is a <br />discussion of the proposed designations and their potential impacts to the transportation system. <br /> <br />The State Highway Freight System, along with the freight systems established at the regional (MPO), <br />county and city levels, link together and identify the roadways within the state that are important for the <br />movement of freight. Because the policy implications of the State Highway Freight System and its <br />relationship to other highway plan policies applies to state highways, the specific designation <br />recommendations in this report apply only to state highways. In order to recognize the interrelated <br />characteristics of the freight system, there are proposed changes to the policy actions to recognize the <br />coordination necessary with local government (see Action 4.A.B). <br /> <br />The next steps are to provide this information to interested stakeholders for their review and comment. <br />Those comments will be forwarded to the FRAP committee for their consideration. The final product will <br />be a recommendation to the OTC which will require a public hearing before the Commission. This public <br />hearing is tentatively scheduled for the December OTC meeting, ultimately resulting in an amendment to <br />the OHP. <br /> <br />DRAFT September 1, 2004 1 <br /> <br /> <br />