My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 3 - PH/Ord. on Cell Towers
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-11/22/04Mtg
>
Item 3 - PH/Ord. on Cell Towers
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:42:10 PM
Creation date
11/17/2004 12:20:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
11/22/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
187 CELL TOWERS CELL TOWERS 188 <br /> You will need to know which, board is responsible for writing such An Ovm,iew of Zoning: <br /> regulations. It may not be tho same board as is given the siting powers, or What It Can -And CatmotDo-According To Fed~alLa~. <br /> later --- enfOrcement powers. For instance, in Massachusetts, tho planning <br /> board may.write the regulations, but a Special Permit Granting Authority The parameters of zoning for "personal wireless servi~e <br /> ($PGA) may be the board of selectmen or the zoning ~d of appeals are set out in federal law, in the Telecommunicnttions A~t of 1996, Section <br /> (ZBA). 704.' <br /> Once you've determined the specifics of your situation, find out '"~:,, Cutting through the le_g~eso of the Telecom Act, a community <br /> when and where the decision-making board meets. Attend some meetings still regulate many aspects of tower siting, Where a tower is located, how <br /> to get a flavor for the personalties of the board members and a s%se of tall it can fl~, what can go on the tower, and how stroh installatio~ am <br /> tho way they approach their work. i monitored or radiofrequency (RF)'omi.nsions to make ~ ' <br /> · .: ---' tl~ are m <br /> It helps to contact other municipalities for information, or local! comphance .ws? ..the. FCC_ standards ~ among many other things, still fall <br /> nc'wspapers that have run articles about other tower*siting scenarios. under l?cal j_unsdwtion. But, there are better and certainly worse ways of <br /> Network. You will find that people who have been active in this field love going about the exercise of'that control. . <br /> to share their stories, expertise, and resources. Consider placing an ad in . ' .The Tei .c~. m .A~ also stipulates that.communities must be <br /> th~ local ~*wspaper to attract other citizens who.are concenled. An ad as'' . m denying permits. Denials should be for substantial reasons ct~nlted ma <br /> simple as: "Interested in the issue of cellular towers in our neighborhoods? written rcco~ of thc p~. The better the zoning regulations are, <br /> Call me at...' .will cost only a few dollars and may help you begin a .thc bett~ will be the' template for denials when siting requests are <br /> srou that the wor oad: are <br />It's fair to Say one person cannot'do this alone. Few people have acuons, snomo mat come to pass. <br />the spare fi~e, energy,, or tenacity to move SUch issues onto center stage . , Vvrhat. a comm~. 'ty cannot, do is to completely ban personal <br />and pressure public officials to act constructively. Plus, there is power in. vnremss service i~om that commumty. Does that mcan it must allow <br />numbers... No city council, or planning board can afford to ignore a room .~ tower or base station wi~ia thc conanunitY? Not ncc~ly. If th~ <br />full of' people who have a clear agenda. But they have little problem ~....~ company could provide service from another adjacent comm-n'_qy, and is <br />ignoring one citizen (or even a small group) whom they can dismiss as .~..:'ialready located on a tower in that ncarhy town, whcr~ by adding <br />. By organizing your neighbors and others throughout the ~ antenn~as they could also cover your town ~ then you might be abl to <br /> keep that company from building a new tower in your town.a The basic <br />community, you will develop a larger voice that will attra_c~ the local legal argument is that your town is not preventing tl~ company fi'om <br />media. When you attend municipal' meetings t° speak about the issues, 'i~i providing service to the community but rather disallowing.a n~w base <br />you will be-heard in a very different way than before. .:~ ~, station to bc erected within town boundaries. The reason for doing so is <br />Om* local group in Great Barrington, Massacbusetts ~ Folks for ~:* that the company can already provide ser-~ce from an existing tower to <br />Appropriate-Cellular Tower Sites, or FACTS .~ became a force to bc '' <br /> .', which the company already has legal accel. <br />reckoned with when it could consistently, and .on very short notice, get ' ~ Under the Telecom Act, conanunities cannot "unreasonably'* <br />fifty or .so people to any meeting where the .tower issues were up for * discriminate among providers. This means the town cannot block one <br />discussion, It did not matter than only about three or four of'those people ~ cellular company from providing' service in the community if' oth~ <br />were really wo~i-g diligently on the iSSU ~ Thc.grOup took on a force far <br />gte, am' than the individual effoms of the members. <br /> <br /> / ..... : ~,. 2Recent case law supportsthis~ Sa~ Jan~ Hobsou's ~ ~T.'~lm~ <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.