Laserfiche WebLink
CELL TOWl~P-~ 19~ <br /> providers have already i~tablished service.~ But towns can ~ and usually ~In addition, towns can require monitoring to make sure that all <br /> do ~ require th~ new Company to codocate on an existing tower. That is facilities meet the maximum FCC emissions guidelines -- no matter how <br /> rea~m~le discrimination -- allowing them both to cover the same area many providers are co-located at a particular site. Very few people at tho <br /> from-the ~ location. You might hear carriers arguing that they want a local level understand that the responsibility for compliance monitoring <br /> belte~ location, or.to provide better service -- but your town is not has shit~ed to municipalities. <br /> required to pll:ntide the carriers the absolute best possible location -- just a <br /> reasonable ~on. If another carrier is already providing service from an Hiring <br /> existing location, then it is probably good enough. ' <br /> In addition, your community must act within a reasonable period Telecommunications regulation and application-review is one of <br /> of time in dealing with applications. Towns cannot put service providers the most complex forms of land-use law today. Done correctly, it is unlike <br /> off indefinitely. State statutes establish precise timelines on land-use ~ anything that most planners and zoners have been called upon to do. Many <br /> applications. In some .slates or municipalities, a permit is automatically shy away from it because of the complexity. But what individual board <br /> granted if a doc~ision-making board does not act within a specified fi'me members are unfamiliar with.can -- and should -- be provided by hiring <br /> frame. It's a decision by default. ' outside expertise. <br /> One of the most vexing clauses in the Telecom Act -- for citizens One of the first things you will need to know is what <br />in particular who are worried about health effects ~ concerns the telecommunications coverage already exists in your area. It is not enough <br />restriction on considering the environmental effects of RF. Municipalities to speculate that a company "ought" to be able to provide coverage from <br />carmot use the environmental effects of radio frequency radiation -- somewhere else. Wireless coverage is a function of tower height, signal <br />which is widely interpreted by many, though not all, to include health strength, frequency, antenna direction, topography and several other <br />effect~ in humans -- as a basis for making a siting decision "to the extent factors. You need to know with precision if another location can work. <br />that such facilities comply with the Commission's regulations concerning And to know, you need expert assistance from an independent RF <br />such emissions." <br /> engineer who is working for the municipality ~ not the <br /> Although towns cannot regulate for RF, it is important to know telecommunications industry. Such an RF engineer will be. familiar with <br />the~ are other concenm that parallel environmental and health concerns the systems and technology of radiofrequency communication and will <br />that can be reed as a basis for zoning. Examples include the use of large . help the town'determine if the information on an application is accurate, or. <br />setl~cks and vegetative screening. This will prevent facilities from being if other solutions would be better for the town's interests. <br />sited too close to dwell~ reduce visual impactS,' and help protect ~ A telecommunications engineer can be helpful Whether an <br />propel~ values. Large setbacl~ will also reduce the potential damage if a ~ application is pending or not. One proactive approach used by <br />tower collapSe~ or lure ice fall from it. Another important avenue is the fact communities is to hire an engineer to help create a telecommunications <br />that 1ms, ers can create an "attra~ve .nuisance" ~ especially to students .~ master plan or overlay district, where facilities can be placed to provide' <br />who may dare each other toclimb them. Aii~sctive nuisance is a legal term * adequate serAce- while still protecting the town's vital inter~. By <br />that could come in handy when denying applications near schools, i having an expert do a few radial or file plots -- diagrams that model RI: <br /> All such provisions can result in the tower being located at a ~ coverage patterns ~ of likely sites, it can help town officials, as well as <br />· reasonable distance from residential areas and schools, thereby reducing , interested citizens, understand how topography and demography work as a <br />RF exposure~ but without directly depending on that rationale to do so. , whole. If a town can anticipate what the carriers want and do their own <br /> ; prior assessment, rather than passively wait for the industrY to define its' <br /> s own goals in town, a win~win situation may result. <br />~ Them is receat ca~ law on this ~ ~h~t_ appears to be in direct conflict with tie ~ The town will have to front money for an RF engineer but the <br />~ :~gom Act. Se~James HobsoR, Clmpter 9, pn~sentation, APT Pittsburgh v. Penn ~, expense is worth-it. A master plan will help with better siting decisions <br /> <br /> <br />