My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 3 - PH/Ord. on Cell Towers
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-11/22/04Mtg
>
Item 3 - PH/Ord. on Cell Towers
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:42:10 PM
Creation date
11/17/2004 12:20:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
11/22/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
217 CELL TOWERS CELL TOWEES 218 <br /> <br />d. Saf'ety ~rotn excessive 'electromagnetic radiation.' In B. In addition to the findings required by the Bylaw in Section <br />case the Tower or Personal .Wireless Service Facilit~ is 171-45, the SPGA shall, in consultation with. the Independent <br />~xmnd to e~ceed the FCC guidelines. ConsultantO), make all of' the applicable findings before <br />2. The foil wing locations are ranked in orde~ of'preference: granting the Special Permit, as f'ollows: <br />a. Shared use of' existing Personal Wireless Service 1. That Applicant is not already providing Adequate Coverage <br />Fac. ilitiesshall be encouraged, and/or Adequate Capacity to the Town of Great <br />b. Clustering of Towers: Applications for Towers adjacent Barrington; and <br />to Existing Towers shah be encouraged. 2. That'Applicant is not able to use .Existing Towers/Facility <br />c. The use of municipal lands which comply with other Sites either with or without the use of Repeaters to <br />requirements of this Article, and where visual impact provide Adequate Coverage and/or Adequate Capacity <br />can be minimized and mitigated, shall be encouraged, to the Town of Great Barrington; and <br />d. The use of Repeaters to provide Adequate Coverage 3. That the Applicant has agreed to rent or lease. Available <br />without requiring new Tower(s) shall be encouraged. Space on the Tower, under the terms of a fair-market <br />e. The use of land, distant from higher density residential lease, without discrimination to other Personal Wireless <br />properties, and where visual impact can be minimized Service Providers; and <br />shall be encouraged. 4. That proposed Personal Wireless Service Facility or Tower <br />3. Towers and Personal Wh'eless Service Facilities shall be will not have an undue adverse impact on historic <br />located so as to provide Adequate COverage and resources, scenic views, residential property values~ <br />Adequate Capacity with the least number-of Towers natural or man=made resources; and <br />and Antennas which is technically and economically 5. That the Applicant has agreed to implement all reasonable <br />feasible, measures to mitigate the potential' adverse impacts of <br />4. The SPGA shall request input fi.om the Chiefs (or their the facilities; and <br />designees) of Fire, Police and other Emergency services 6. That the proposal shall comply with FCC Reg 96-326 <br />regarding the adequacy for emergency access of the regarding emissions of electromagnetic radiation and <br />planned drive or roadway to the site. that the required Monitoring program is in place and <br />IX § 171 - 128, li'.valnation by Independent ConsUltants. shall be paid for by the Applicant; and <br />A. Upon submission of a complete Application for a Special These findings create the basis for approval or denial. If <br />Permit under this Article, the SPGA shall provide its the application does not comply with the requirements of <br />Independent Consultant(s) with the full Application for their the bylaw, crud the SPG,4 can include that determination in <br />analy~ and review, a written recora~ it has a good chance of prevailing in a <br />B~ ApPlicants for any Special Permit under this Article Shall denittl of the,4pplicatio,. <br />obtain permission from the Owner(s) of the proposed <br />pr0peqy(s) .or Facilities Site(s) for the Town's Independent C. Any' decision by the SPGA to deny an Application for a <br />Consultant(s), to conduct any necessary site visit(s). Special Permit under this Article shall be in conformance with <br /> .SEC. 332 [47 U.S.C. 332] (7)(BXiii) of the Act, in that it shall <br />X § 171 - I29. Approval Criteria: be .in writing .and supported by substantial evidence contained <br />A. In acting on the Special Permit Application, the SPGA shall in a written record. <br />proceed in accordance with the procedures and timelines <br />established for Special Permits in Article X ofthe Bylaw. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.