My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 3 - PH/Ord. on Cell Towers
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-11/22/04Mtg
>
Item 3 - PH/Ord. on Cell Towers
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:42:10 PM
Creation date
11/17/2004 12:20:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
11/22/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i6'264, Lane Code 16.264 <br /> <br />..... (vii) Dooumentation demonstrating that the Federal Aviation <br /> )' . Administration (FAA) has reviewed and commented on the proposal, and the Oregon <br /> . Department of Aviation has reviewed and provided comment on the proposal. <br /> (viii) Plans showing how vehicle access Will be provided and <br /> documents demonstrating that necessary easements have been obtained; and <br /> (ix) Other information requested in the application form provided <br /> by the Director, such as but not limited to, peer review by an independent engineering <br /> firm of the proposed telecommunications facility system design. <br /> (e) . The applicant shall identify all existing towers, or properties that <br /> have obtained approval for a tower within ten (10) miles of the proposed tower location. <br /> The applicant shall provide evidence that collocation at all existing or approved towers <br /> within ten miles is not feasible, and provide documentation for locating a new tower, <br /> based on either of the following: <br /> (i) Lack of useable and compatible collocation space; <br /> (ii) Inability to meet service coverage area and capacity needs; or <br /> (iii) Technical reasons such as channel Proximity and inter- <br /> 'modulation. <br /> (d) The tower shall comply with all required State of Oregon and <br /> Federal licenses for telecommunication tower facilities. The application shall include a. <br /> certificati'on that the completed installation will cOmply with all Federal, state and local <br /> standards. The applicant shall submit documentation demonstrating compliance with non- <br /> ionizing electromagnetic radiation (NIER) emission standards as set forth by the Federal <br /> Communications Commission (FCC). <br /> (e) 'Factual information addressing compliance with requirements in LC. <br /> 16.264 (4) and (5), below. <br /> (4) Collocation Requirements for Telecornrn,mication Facilities. Collocation <br /> of a telecommunications facility on an existing structure or building is not subject to the <br /> land use application and approval provisions of LC 16.264 (3). However, collocation, of <br /> a new or replacement telecommunication facility may be allowed provided a land use <br /> application is submitted pursuant to LC 14.050 and approved pursuant to LC 14.100. <br /> The application for collocation may be allowed provided the'requirements in LC <br /> 16.264(4)(a) and (b) are met. <br /> (a) An application for collocation of a new or replacement <br /> telecommunications facility shall provide the information required in LC 16.264(3)Co)(i)- <br /> (ix) and (d). <br /> (b) Factual information addressing compliance with requirements in LC <br /> 16.264 (5) and (6), below. <br /> .(5) Siting Standards for Height, Setbacks and Access t° Telecommunication <br /> Facilities. The following standards shall apply to all new or replacement telecommuni- <br /> cation facilities. <br /> (a) Consideration shall be given to other sites in the service area that <br /> would have less visual impact than the site proposed as viewed from nearby residences <br /> and that the applicant has demonstrated,that less intrusive sites ar.e not available or do not <br /> provide the communication coverage necessary to provide the service. Visual impact can <br /> be measured by techniques including, but not limited to, balloon tests and photo <br /> simulations. <br /> Co) Telecommunication facilities shall be limited to the height necessary <br /> to provide the service, not to exceed 200 feet in height from ground level. <br /> (c) Directional / parabolic antennae shall be selected to optimize <br /> performance and minimize visual impact. <br /> (d) The setbacks for a tower shall be the setback otherwise allowed for <br /> · all other structures in the zone except that: <br /> <br /> 16-457 WE) l/c/O0056.Chapter16.250-264/T <br /> IV-23 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.