Item 4 - PH/Ord. on Kaufman Hse - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

II. EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS Land Use History Parcel 9200 was annexed in 1889 and was improved prior to 1936 (per lfistoric aerial photos)i A parcel was originally created and recbrded in 1941 (tax lot 5300), measuring 198.4 feet by 100 fket. In 1961, the parcel was rerdeeded with an additional I 1,622 square feet of area noah ofthe -. previously deeded parcel. Given that the lot was ricorded in its current configuration prior to August 14, 1962, and asthe lot conta;ins more than ~6,000 square feet and has greater than 60 feet of tkontage, Trax Lot 9200 qualifies as a legal lot. Parcel 9300 was also annexed in 1889 with Construction of the existing structure occmzing in 1920. The existing parcel was originally recorded i~ its cun-ent configuration in 1950. measuring 66.3 by 161 feet (tax lot 4700). Given that the parcel was created prior to August 14, 1962, and as the lot contains, more than 6,000 square feet and has greater than 60 feet of frontage, Tax Lot 9300 qualifies as a legal lot. In 1968 a Conditional Use Permit (CU 68-3) for a group care.hcili¢' run by the U.S. Veterans Affairs was applied for on tax lot 9300 (then 4700) {see a~achment D). Two other permits for similar Uses in the surrounding area (CU 68-1 and CU 68-2) were also applied for at the same time. Wkh regard to CU 68~3, tl~e request was g?anted subject to the following conditions: · .In 1972, a Conditional Use Permit (CU 72-45) for the ex/sting Kaufman Senior Center and Annex (trax lots 9200 and 9300) was applied for (see A~achment E). The conditional use was approved subject to the following conditions: I. Provision for 15 off-street parking Spaces; 2. Submission of an improvement petition for the alley if alley access is utilized, or lira itation of access to 10th Avenue with preservation of the planters along the alley; 3. Provision ora landscaped buffer with a minimum width of five feet and an average planting height of four to five feet alonz the West marzin"bfthe parki'ne area; 4. 'Preservation of the large che~' tree located along tlie east edge of the parking arem 5. Provision ora durable, dust-free surface for the parking area: 6. Planning Commission review 0fthe.off-stree~ parking provision ill October, 1973; Maintenance of the buildings ~nd ,,rounds in a state 0fgood repair: and 8. Adherence to Building Code requirements. Upon approval of the CUP, tl~e applicant began to operate the prope~y as a senior center. June 19, 1974. a memorandum fi-om Edwin R. Smith 0f the Kaufi~an Senior Center was sent to the Planning Director indicating that conditions I. 3.5: and 6 had not been completed: dmt condition 2 had been partially completed: that condition 4 had been co~pleted~ but the u'ee had died and hacl to be removed: and that conditions 7 and '8 had been completed. In response to the memo. tl~e planning department responded in a second memo (,undated) that to eiim inare the need Ibr parking and thereby remedy rl~e lack or'compliance with rl~e conditions related modificat'io, or' the original Conditional Use Permi[ would be required. In .lune or' 1980. a 58