Item 4 - PH/Ord. on Kaufman Hse - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Answer: Like~,Ls'e. thLs'.fiwt cozdd be ttsed to a.s:s'LYt h7 the'crq/?hTg.'developme,! of t/Te i;arkh~g · proposal. The record Shows in par//ha! there Lr re/ctti¥'ely little opl)osilion or complaint related lo the operation of the ce,let o¥'er the past 20 to 2$ yec,:r. 2.5 If the Center installed t3vo new parking spaces on the Tax Lot 9200 through a CUP or CUP modification process, thus ensuring that the existing number of parking spaces serving the Center (3 spaces on TL 9200 and 2 out of the 5 spaces on TL 9300) would remain the same, would the ciD' support this argument in the application approval Process." Ans~ver: This is not a good al/erect'/!ye 'becam'e it does not actdress the use of the s. ite. 2.6 HOW would designation of the structure or zoning of the property as historic impact a decision regarding parking? ' ' Answe. r: "The hristoric designation loP..ovides opportzmities to crc~ developme, t standards specific to the needs of the site. These include standards related to parking. 2.7 A~-e there Other factors'.r~lfited to parking that Facilities should consider at this point in time given their mandate to sell the Annex property?'' A,sYver: If less than 3 a~aces are added to the site, ,o law'king area landscaping ,vould be requ#'ed. Restritving of existi, g paved area does not t~-igger lcmdscapi, g. Neither does developing ct.new wwonnected parking area of zmcter 3 spaces. 3. Zoning In order to determine ifa zone change could potentially facilitate the sale of the Annex by providing for the Senior Center as an outright permitted use (as opposed to a conditional use), Sa/re has reviewed a number of alternative zoning designations for the Senior Center site (see Appendix I for Satre's analysis of potential zoning designations). The following questions have been posed to determine whether or not a zone change could help facilitate sale of the Annex. Relponses to'these questions are also hseful if it is determined that both the Annex and the Kaufman Center are declared as surplus propmW to be sold. At this time, funding for the tenant, RSVP, comes from Lane CommuniW .College and there is some question whether the program will continue to be funded. The Ciw li~ previously determined that there is no funding available to support the Center internally. 3,1 Please confirm that rezoning all or part of the subject site to PRO is not pOssible given the siting requirements contained in EC 9,2610. Answer: Potentially OK p/'ovided EC ~.261~(]) could be .vt/cces4fid~v met (not &e "or'" separati/~g r'~) crud (2)). Slqff'u,otdd ,Oi recomme/M it. 3.2 Would the ci~, support a rezone/?om R-2 m' R-3 to PL for the Senior Center parcel? ...ln.vwer: Potentially. hut .vtq[f ~'ould not recomme,d it hecam'e rezo.fl~g (/'sold ~/,s' well m' zm,vz/ppo/'tive t;ol&v direc~io, h~ the ~'Ve,5't, ffde pkm. 3.3 Would the ciU' support a zone change tbr the R-2 portion of the site.to S-DW? .-t//.v~.'er; There ~/ppea/',v Io he tittle ,¥z/ppo/'t. fhr .vz//;l;Ort.a /'ezo.e ;o ,%DI't( At, vt/ex/'e/a/ed/o e/'o,vio, ot'/'e, vide.fia/ c'ha/'ac/er, //.'xed.~/,¥e, etc, 72 Page ..X-; t"ebrt~arv. 2003 Kat~lh~an 51cnJ()r (.'cruet