Laserfiche WebLink
3.4 If the applicant were to downzone the R-3 portion of the site to R-2, would the city <br /> entertain a subsequent rezone to S-DW? <br /> <br /> '. See above. <br /> <br /> 3.5 If the site were to be rezoned to S-DW, would the residential devdopment <br /> standards, particularly the density, requirement, apply given its development with <br /> existing structures? Note that neither property., was identified as being available for <br /> residential development in the 1995 Residential Lands Inventory.. <br /> <br /> See above. <br /> <br /> 3.6 Does the ci~ have any insight into the intent of the City Council for retaining the <br /> existing residential character of the site While meeting the minimum density <br /> requirement in the S-DW zone?. <br /> <br /> Ans'wer: Based on comments at the meleting, appears that infill mco~ be more important than <br /> character. <br /> <br /> 3.7 Please confirm the allowed density for each residential zone (see table on page 7 of. <br /> this report). <br /> <br /> Ans~.ver: Staff?nd?cared that the densi,ty calculations in the above mentioned ?able were correctly <br /> calculated Staff noted that because the Annex ia' zmder 3,500 square feet and is currently <br /> developed, the densi~., standards to not apply, b¢ short, the Annex could be utilized in its current <br /> state as a single-family dwelling. <br /> 3.8 In the event that the Existing Conditional Use permit for the site was discontinued, <br /> how would the existing residential structures be classified with regard to use <br /> provided the zoning of the properties did not change? (e.g. would they be considered <br /> single family and therefore existing non-conforming in the Zone?') Please identify <br /> the applicable code sections. <br /> <br /> Answer: Staff relied on EC 9.2751(1);d) to interpret this item. Indicated that the senior center <br /> would not revert back to SFR if the CUP 3.i, ere discontinued Need to have a formal interpretation <br /> made regarding this isx'ue. <br /> <br /> 3.9 Based on what you know of this site, would Planning or Land 'Use staff recommend <br /> a zone change of any type in this case in order facilitate the sale of the Annex <br /> property.? <br /> <br /> .'4nswer: Staff indicated generaI sUp]raft for a rezone to historic because of the flexibiliLy it would <br /> qfford the site. <br /> <br /> 3.10 Are there other factors related to zoning that Facilities should consider at this point <br /> in time given their request to sell the Annex:property? <br /> <br /> 4. Historic status/Designati°n <br /> Given that the age of the structures on both properties exceeds 50 years. Satre is interested in <br /> whether or not it would be advantageous to pursue historic designation at' the structure or the <br /> parcel in order to facilitate sale of the Annex. Please address the tbltowing questions regarding <br /> the historic status of both Sites and the potential fbr historic designation/zoning: <br /> <br /> 73 <br /> <br /> .. . _0 L) Paae A-4 <br />I(at~limm .5uJl/()r ~'cnter ["c{'H'uarv. '~ ( ~ <br />!,and IJ~c All. crnativcs I),cp(~rt <br /> <br /> <br />