Laserfiche WebLink
4.1 Given the age of the exiSting improvements on both parcels, what are the. <br /> possibilities in terms of Historic Designation? <br /> 4..2 What use options would be available to the applicant if the sites were identified as <br /> haying historic value? <br /> 4.3 What process(es) would be required to designate the sites as historic? <br /> 4.4 Would the city. support a rezone to S-H, Historic for either site? <br /> 4.5 If so, what standards related to both use and development would apply? <br /> 4.6 Ho~, might Historic Designation of one or both parcels facilitate the sate of the - .' -. <br /> Annex? ' ..... <br /> <br /> 4~7 Are 'there Other factors related to historic status or designation that Facilities should. <br /> consider at this point in time given their request to sell the Annex property? -' <br /> <br /> For answers related to the Historic Status and Desi ,marion of the site, fllease see the ~4)ritten <br /> material prepared by Ken Guzo~vski located in Appendix B. <br /> <br /> 74 <br />I):.1 ,'e ,'\-5 I"ul)rtlal",,'. _(,)0.~ I<.;..ILI 1i11.0.11 ):;ell i()r (. Clltt~r <br /> J, ;)ll(.J I J:q(2 ,.\llerl/ativ(~'-: I? ........ ,' <br /> <br /> <br />