Laserfiche WebLink
Exhibit B <br />Policy F-15, the City has gone further, establishing a mobility standard of LOS “F” for <br />the area within the Downtown Plan boundary, including the subject property. <br />The Applicant’s TPR Analysis establishes that intersections abutting and near <br />the subject site operate currently at LOS “A” in the AM peak hour, and at LOS “B” in <br />the PM peak hour. (Exhibit 6 – Table 6, pg. 10) <br />Tables 7 and 8 of the TPR Analysis demonstrates that using the reasonable <br />worst case commercial uses allowed under the proposed Commercial land use <br />designation and/or C-2 zoning would not degrade the level of service in either the AM <br />or PM peak hours. (Ibid., pg. 11) <br />Tables 9 and 10 demonstrate that at the end of the TransPlan planning period <br />(the year 2027), traffic generated under the reasonable worst case commercial uses <br />allowed under Commercial land use designation and zoning would still not fall below <br />acceptable levels of service permitted anywhere in the community, and would also <br />not exceed the reduced LOS adopted by the City for the downtown area and subject <br />property. <br />The TPR analysis in Exhibit 6 establishes that the proposed Plan amendment <br />and zone change does not have a “significant affect” on the transportation system as <br />defined in subsection (c)(A)-(C) above because the proposed Plan amendment and <br />zone change would not result in land uses that would be inconsistent with the existing <br />functional classifications of streets near the subject property, would not result in <br />reduced performance standards below those allowed in the TSP (i.e., LOS “F”), and <br />would not worsen performance of transportation facilities below minimum levels <br />allowed in the TSP. <br />Therefore, the proposed Plan amendment and zone change does not trigger the <br />“significant affect” standards of the TPR (OAR 660-012-0060(1)), and is consistent <br />with Statewide Planning Goal 12. <br />Goal 13 – Energy Conservation: To conserve energy. <br />Findings: <br /> The Metro Plan and its neighborhood refinement plan, the 2004 Eugene <br />Downtown Plan, support compact urban development integrated with effective <br />transportation options. The proposed Plan diagram amendment legitimizes the long- <br />standing commercial use on the site, and allows for potential mixed use development <br />consistent with existing and proposed Metro Plan and zoning overlay designations. <br />Furthermore, approval of the Plan amendment will allow continued vibrant <br />th <br />commercial development at the site on a walkable “Great Street” (i.e., 5 Avenue, as <br />identified in the Downtown Plan) with bike lanes and transit service, and proximate to <br />inter-urban rail. The amendment, therefore, will encourage energy conservation and <br />is consistent with Statewide Planning Goal 13. <br />