My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 20542
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
2014 No. 20520 - 20547
>
Ordinance No. 20542
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/17/2018 10:27:44 AM
Creation date
11/26/2014 12:14:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Ordinances
CMO_Document_Number
20542
Document_Title
Ordinance Concerning Public Contracts
Adopted_Date
10/27/2014
Approved Date
10/30/2014
CMO_Effective_Date
11/30/2014
Signer
Piercy
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Effect on Competition. None. Requires complete and open competition within <br />the same pool of potential contractors that would be qualified to respond to an <br />invitation to bid. <br />No Favoritism. Requires complete and open competition within the same pool <br />of potential contractors that would be qualified to respond to an invitation to bid, <br />while identifying discrete, weighted criteria on which submitted proposals must be <br />evaluated. <br />Other Factors. ORS 279C.400 authorizes the use of a formal competitive <br />proposal solicitation subject to an adopted exemption. This exemption ensures <br />this method is available for use as deemed appropriate by the purchasing agent <br />and solicitation agents. <br />EC 2.1430(2) — City funded privately -constructed public improvements. <br />Alternate Award Process. Not applicable. City does not award contract. <br />Cost Savings and Other Benefits. <br />1. No mobilization cost. <br />2. Reduced engineering and design costs -ties into existing project. <br />3. No solicitation expense. <br />4. Allows city to take advantage of private funding and development <br />activities to enhance public infrastructure. <br />Effect on Competition. None. The contract is awarded by private business <br />owner who has personal motivation to minimize cost of improvements. <br />No Favoritism. City does not select general contractor. General contractor is <br />selected by developer. <br />Other Factors. Initiated by private entities rather than city. City responds to <br />opportunity. <br />EC 2.1430(3)(a) Hybrid Contracts — Design/build contracts. <br />Alternate Award Process. Requires the use of formal, advertised request for <br />proposals. <br />Cost Savings and Other Benefits. Award of Design/Build contract to the lowest <br />bidder under an invitation to bid would dramatically increase the risk of <br />unsuccessful projects, waste and improper expenditure of public funds. Use of <br />the RFP process is necessary to allow staff to evaluate the unique qualifications <br />of the Design/Build team which will include personal service providers as well as <br />construction experts. <br />EXHIBIT A - FINDINGS PAGE 3 OF 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.