Laserfiche WebLink
Draft 9/29/14 <br />E.Urban and Urbanizable Land <br />This section addresses the need to allow for the orderly and economic extension of public <br />services, the need to provide an orderly conversion of urbanizable to urban land, and the need to <br />provide flexibility for market forces to operate in order to maintain affordable housing choices. <br />For the definitions of urban and urbanizable lands, as well as rural lands and the urban growth <br />boundary (UGB) as used in this section, refer to the Metro PlanGlossary. <br />The undeveloped (urbanizable) area within the metropolitan UGB, separating urban and <br />urbanizable land from rural land, washas beencarefully calculated to include an adequate supply <br />to meet demand for a projected population of 286,000 through the end of the planning period <br />(2015). When the metropolitan UGB was established for the 1995-2015 planning period, Lane <br />County, Eugene and Springfield realized, Hhowever, that unless the community consciously <br />decidesd to limit future expansions of the UGB, one of several ways to accommodate growth, <br />that boundary willwould need to be expanded in future plan updates. The jurisdictions <br />anticipatedso that before 2015,the metropolitan UGB would it will include more urbanizable <br />area reflecting future metro-wide population and employment needs of populations beyond those <br />in 2015. than that now depicted on the Metro PlanDiagram.Accordingly, pPeriodic updates of <br />land use needs and revision of the metropolitan UGB to reflect extensions of the planning period <br />were expected towill ensure that adequate surplus urbanizable land iswasalways available. <br />With the transition mandated in 2007 by ORS 197.304, the shared metropolitan UGB will be <br />replaced with two separate UGBs (the Eugene UGB and the Springfield UGB).This changed <br />the land use work programs for the three jurisdictions. Evaluation of the sufficiency of the 2015 <br />metropolitan UGB was replaced with an in-depth analysis of each city’s independent needs and <br />the supplies of land that exist with respect to the separate areas of jurisdictional responsibility. <br />That process began with the three jurisdictions’ adoption of city-specific population forecasts in <br />Chapter I of the Metro Plan. In 2011, the City of Springfield, with co-adoption by Lane County, <br />amended the Metro Plan to establish its own UGB consistent with ORS 197.304. <br />3 <br />The three jurisdictions continue to agree that the key to addressing the needs stated at the <br />beginning of this section is not so much the establishment of a UGB, but maintaining an <br />adequate and reasonable supply of available undeveloped land at any point in time. The <br />“adequate” and “reasonable” tests are the key to the related phasing and surplus land issues. <br />In order to maintain an “adequate” supply of available surplus land to allow development to <br />occur, annexation must take place in advance of demand in order to allow for the provision of <br />public capital improvements, such as wastewater trunk lines, arterial streets, and water trunk <br />lines. Most capital improvement programs are “middle-range” type plans geared three to six <br />years into the future. The time between annexation and the point of finished construction usually <br />involves several steps: <br /> <br />3 <br />Springfield Ordinance No. 6268 and Lane County Ordinance No. PA1274. <br />II-E-1 <br />