My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 20545
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
2014 No. 20520 - 20547
>
Ordinance No. 20545
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/26/2014 12:51:07 PM
Creation date
11/26/2014 12:50:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Ordinances
CMO_Document_Number
20545
Document_Title
Ordinance Amending the Eugene-Springfield Metroplitan Area General Plan
Adopted_Date
11/24/2014
Approved Date
11/25/2014
Signer
Piercy
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
180
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Draft 9/29/14 <br />Existing Housing Supply and Neighborhoods <br />Findings <br />28. Accommodating residential growth within the current UGB encourages in-fill, <br />rehabilitation, and redevelopment of the existing housing stock and neighborhoods. <br />29. As the age of the housing stock reaches 25 years, the need for rehabilitation, <br />weatherization, and major system upgrades increases. Approximately 59 percent of the <br />single-family housing stock was built prior to 1969. <br />30. More renters than owners live in sub-standard housing conditions. Based on the 1995 <br />Eugene/Springfield Consolidated Plan, about 16 percent of all occupied rental units of <br />the metropolitan housing stock are considered to be in sub-standard condition. <br />31. Local government has had and will continue to have a role in preserving the aging <br />housing stock. Preserving the housing stock has numerous benefits to the community <br />because much of the older housing stock represents affordable housing. In addition, <br />upgrading the aging housing stock provides benefits that help stabilize older <br />neighborhoods in need of revitalization. <br />Policies <br />A.25 Conserve the metropolitan area’s supply of existing affordable housing and increase the <br />stability and quality of older residential neighborhoods, through measures such as <br />revitalization; code enforcement; appropriate zoning; rehabilitation programs; relocation <br />of existing structures; traffic calming; parking requirements; or public safety <br />considerations. These actions should support planned densities in these areas. <br />A.26 Pursue strategies that encourage rehabilitation of existing housing and neighborhoods. <br />Affordable, Special Need, and Fair Housing <br />78 <br />Finding <br />32. Substantial and continued federal funding reductions for housing assistance are <br />increasing the burden on local governments. The high cost of housing for low-income <br /> <br />7 <br />Affordable housing: Housing priced so that a household at or below median income pays no more than 30 percent <br />of its total gross income on housing and utilities. [U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) <br />figure for 1997 annual median income for a family of three in Lane County is $33,900; 30 percent = $847/month.] <br />8 <br />Special need housing: Housing for special needs populations. These populations represent some unique sets of <br />housing problems and are usually at a competitive disadvantage in the marketplace due to circumstances beyond <br />their control. These subgroups include, but are not limited to, the elderly, persons with disabilities, homeless <br />individuals and families, at-risk youth, large families, farm workers, and persons being released from correctional <br />institutions. <br />III-A-11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.