Laserfiche WebLink
A major landslide into a reservoir, whether triggered by seismic activity or not, <br /> could result in a large surge wave that could result in dam failure from a <br /> combination of overtopping and hydrodynamic forces. <br /> <br /> A major earthquake, either a Cascadia Subduction Zone earthquake, or a <br /> smaller, interplate or intraplate earthquake in Western Oregon, could cause <br /> sufficient damage to these dams to pose a risk of failure. <br /> <br />12,5 Risk Assessment (Preliminary) <br /> <br />Each of these major dams which pose a potential life safety hazard for the <br />Eugene/Springfield Metro Area is operated by the United States Army Corps of <br />Engineers. The Portland District of the Corps, Geotechnical Engineer Branch, <br />Concrete and Dam Safety Section has safety responsibilities for these dams. As of <br />early 2001, the Dam Safety Coordinator was Jim Hinds, whose phone number is (503) <br />808-4846. A variety of dam safety related information is also available on the Portland <br />District's web site at www. nwp.usace.army, mil. Under the Corps normal dam operating <br />practices, dams are inspected annually, with a more complete evaluation every five <br />years on a rotating schedule. <br /> <br /> 12.5.1 Flood Damage to Dams <br /> <br />All of the Corps dams were designed and built with specific flood capacities. Current <br />dam designs are based on Standard Project Floods. Standard Project Floods, as <br />defined in the Corps Engineer Manual 1110-2-1411 (March 1, 1965) are floods <br />resulting from the Standard Project Storm. In turn, the Standard Project Storm is <br />defined, somewhat imprecisely, as the most severe flood-producing rainfall-snowmelt, <br />depth-area-duration event that is considered "reasonably characteristic" of the <br />drainage basin. Discussions with Corps staff in the Portland District Office indicated <br />that the Standard Project Flood is approximately a 500-year flood event. <br /> <br />The Corp dams' discharge design levels include the combination of spillway discharge <br />capacity and reservoir outlet pipe discharge capacity. For example, for the Hills Creek <br />Dam, the Standard Project Flood is 64,500 cubic feet per second. The maximum <br />controlled discharge capacity of the dam is 151,760 cubic feet per second, or nearly <br />two and one-half times the Standard Project Flood discharge. These data are included <br />on the Hills Creek Project, Emergency Response Flowchartz. At discharges beyond <br />the maximum controlled discharge capacity of the dam, the dam would be overtopped, <br />discharges would be uncontrolled, and there would be a high probability of damage to <br />the dam, with some potential for dam failure. The large margin of safety in the <br />discharge capacity of the dam suggests that the Hills Creek Dam likely has the <br />capacity to withstand floods at least as large as a 1,000 year flood event without <br />expected damage. The other Corps dams have similar margins of flood design safety. <br /> <br /> 12.5.2 Earthquake Damage to Dams <br /> <br />All of these dams were designed and built in the 1940s to 1960s. Seismic design <br />considerations were thus significantly lower than current seismic design <br />considerations. A summary tabulation of the seismic design basis and inspection <br />Public Review Draft: August 6, 2004 <br /> 12-7 <br /> <br /> <br />