My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B: Judicial Evaluation Committee Report
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2006
>
CC Agenda - 05/22/06 Work Session
>
Item B: Judicial Evaluation Committee Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:13:50 PM
Creation date
5/18/2006 8:28:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
5/22/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />own standards, and developing a selection and training program to develop a <br />pool of qualified Spanish interpreters to meet the court's needs. <br /> <br />Response to 2006 Survey <br />· In response to the comments expressing the desire for Judge Allen to do more <br />community outreach, Judge Allen and the committee discussed the May 1 <br />Law Day open public forum which, at that time, was being planned. The <br />committee pointed out how difficult it is for a judge to do community <br />outreach when they must always be perceived as being neutral. <br />· Judge Allen discussed the coaching and counseling he has provided to the <br />judges who report to him. <br /> <br />Maior Issues for the Court from 2006 Survey <br />. Judge Allen pointed out it will be a big change for the court when the current <br />Court Administrator retires. <br />· The change in case type and complexity continue to be a concern for Judge <br />Allen as well as the survey respondents. As potentially more serious cases are <br />shifted to the municipal court, the ability of the court to deal effectively with <br />community quality oflife issues may be compromised. <br />. Regarding lack of space for the court, Judge Allen pointed out that the court <br />has been involved in the City's efforts to define future space needs and plan <br />for a new City Hall, as well as possible interim court space. <br />. There was interest expressed in survey responses for the court to become a <br />court of record. Given that there are so few appeals, Judge Allen and the <br />committee did not feel the cost of the staff and technology would warrant this <br />effort at this time. <br /> <br />Where Is Municipal Court Heading? <br />The next four years will very likely provide the City Council with the opportunity to <br />further define the kind of court it wants its municipal court to be, as on-going budget <br />reductions at the State and County level further reduce the ability of the District <br />Attorney and the Circuit Court to handle misdemeanor offenses. The court and Judge <br />Allen consistently get high ratings on their performance because of the size, resources <br />and collaborative nature of this court to be innovative and responsive to community <br />concerns. With more serious and complex cases added to an already full caseload, it <br />will be less and less possible for the municipal court to deal with quality of life issues, <br />offer educational diversion programs, and provide extra services to marginalized <br />populations. Eugene Municipal Court has just completed a year-long effort to <br />develop a shared vision for the court to the year 2015. This vision statement was <br />shared with the committee, and its development involved judges, staff and key <br />stakeholders within and outside the City organization. <br /> <br />COMMITTEE FINDINGS <br />The committee expresses its appreciation to Judge Allen for his service as presiding <br />judge for the past four years. In particular, he should be recognized for the work he <br />has done to address issues of the mentally ill and the Spanish-speaking community. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.