My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2006
>
CC Agenda - 05/22/06 Meeting
>
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:26:26 PM
Creation date
5/18/2006 8:53:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
5/22/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Anthony Beck <br />, 309 Clark Street, commented that British Columbia was the “Mecca” and birthplace of the <br />Free Ride mountain bike movement. He said some of the school systems in the Vancouver area had <br />mountain biking as part of their curriculum. He listed two areas in Oregon that offered the opportunity to <br />participate in this type of sport. He averred that the creators of those areas modeled cooperation with land <br />managers and worked to understand liability issues and how to build structures properly so that the work <br />would result in trails that were environmentally sustainable. He related that he and others presented a <br />proposal to do this type of work to the Parks, Recreation, and Open Spaces Division a week earlier. He <br />reiterated that there were “plenty of mountain bikers” who were willing to help with the design and building <br />of such a facility. He noted that two years earlier, a Free Ride competition had been held at the Lane <br />County Fair and it drew over 100 riders representing a wide range of ages and abilities and from both the <br />local area and other places, including Washington and California. <br /> <br />Diane Shock <br />, 5509 Barger Drive, thanked the City Council for acknowledging the need to make the <br />Golden Gardens Park safe and for considering an allocation of money toward that end. She urged the <br />council to include in the bond measure acquisition of additional land around the ponds to allow the ponds <br />edges to be sloped. She said additional acreage needed to be secured while the surrounding land was <br />undeveloped and still available. She asked that an emergency call box be installed there. She stressed the <br />importance of moving the project to a Priority 1 and of fast-tracking the process. She added that the <br />development of Golden Gardens Park would also offer a “delightful mix” of the high priority attributes that <br />fit within the Rivers to Ridges study principles of recreation, education, habitat and wetlands, as well as <br />matching the objectives of the PROS plan for the expansion of outdoor activities, the promotion of <br />environmental awareness, and education and stewardship. She said it would encourage exercise as well. <br /> <br />Julia Pommert <br />, 2740 Almaden Street, supported adding more recreation into the PROS measure. She <br />recognized that the original focus was on acquiring open space, but she felt in talking to people in the <br />community they indicated concern that the space would be purchased and not developed. She averred that <br />if people felt there was something in the bond measure for them, they were more likely to support it. <br /> <br />David Hinkley <br />, 1340 Lawrence Street, #1, supported development of the Jefferson Area Greenway south <br />of the Amazon Canal into a park. He said thanks to the assistance and support of the Lane County <br />Fairgrounds, the neighborhood, fairgrounds, and a number of other stakeholders had come up with a <br />conceptual plan for the park. He related that the plan had been pitched to the City five years earlier but the <br />City, minority property owner in that area, wanted to go through a prioritization process and had no <br />funding at the time. He was happy that it was on the priority list, but unhappy that it was listed as a <br />Priority 3. He felt opportunities for funding were being lost, given that it was not likely to be developed for <br />10 to 15 years. He observed that it was an atypical park as it was a joint operation between Lane County <br />and the City. He asked that the project be moved up to Priority 1, or if not, that it be split into two pieces: <br />the planning piece as a Priority 1 project, and the development piece as a project with a lower priority. <br /> <br />Azra Khalidi <br />, 4023-K Donald Street, averred that the City of Eugene had not had strong enough land use <br />laws when it annexed south Eugene in the 1960s and 1970s. She noted that the construction business had <br />become a booming industry. She was afraid that the Amazon Headwaters would be lost along with <br />surrounding riparian areas and trees if it was not protected. She strongly recommended that the existing <br />Amazon Headwaters land and its environs be designated as park land. She thought this should be achieved <br />by working with Lane County. She urged the council to think regionally and act locally. <br /> <br />Debbie Jeffries <br />, 3800 North Delta Highway, asserted that the existing inventory the project list was based <br />upon did not include private sector park land and also did not include land owned by the Bureau of Land <br />Management (BLM) and The Nature Conservancy (TNC). She said the latter totaled 1,500 acres. She had <br />not thought to participate in the process, given that her property was under the County’s jurisdiction. She <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council April 10, 2006 Page 17 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.