Laserfiche WebLink
related that in her case, as well as Eugene Sand & Gravel, there had been no participation and she had been <br />assured that the comprehensive plan did not include her property. She said the linear park total was <br />referenced with partner funded acres on page 5 of the memorandum, but the people who owned the <br />property along the McKenzie and Willamette rivers were all County residents and none of them had <br />participated. She indicated that she did not know who of the property owners intended to partner with <br />funding as no one she had spoken to had agreed to this. She asked that the council take a hard look at the <br />overall comprehensive plan and list and remove the people who were under County jurisdiction. <br /> <br />Nancy Pollard <br />, 4671 Spring Meadow, Principal of Madison Middle School, stated that the School District <br />4J greatly valued partnering with the City. She reiterated that the synthetic surfaces added hours of service <br />to athletic fields. She stated that Madison Middle School just opened a new building and had been without <br />a field for a number of years. She hoped that field development would begin this spring. She thanked the <br />council for supporting the community’s young people. <br /> <br />Mary Monette <br />, 3261 Richard Avenue, co-chair of the Friends of Golden Gardens Park, stated that the <br />group developed a 50-point proposal for step-by-step improvement of the park. She stressed the necessity <br />of moving the park up from a Priority 5 to a Priority 1. She expressed appreciation for the council’s <br />willingness to undertake the feasibility study. She related that the group wished to work with Eugene Fire <br />and Emergency Medical Services immediately to develop safety measures for the park before the summer. <br />She reiterated that the group wanted to purchase the land around the ponds in order to slope the sides. She <br />said the first rough cost estimate they had was $400,000. She commented that the purchase of another 100 <br />acres around the Golden Gardens Park could be used for more ball parks. She felt the location was the <br />perfect setting for a wonderful park. She conveyed her appreciation for all of the help the group received <br />from staff and the council. <br /> <br />th <br />Jon Belcher <br />, 1240 West 15 Avenue, #4, on behalf of the Jefferson Greenway Committee, wanted to keep <br />alive the Jefferson Amazon Greenway. He related that in 1998, a group of Jefferson/Westside neighbors <br />developed a vision to naturalize the Amazon Canal along the Fairgrounds and maintain the passive uses of <br />the south side of the Fairgrounds, including the City park plan that was once the Jefferson Pool site. The <br />neighborhood group worked with the Fair Board to develop a conceptual plan (copies of which were <br />provided to the council) that met the Fairgrounds’ needs and the vision of the neighbors who approved the <br />plan. He said they then took the plan to the City, but had been told to wait through the PROS process to be <br />put into the “pipeline.” Initially, the plan had been made a Priority 1, and then moved to a Priority 2, but <br />now with the shifting of acquisition before development, it had dropped to Priority 3. Meanwhile, the <br />group worked with the Eugene Stream Team to complete plantings along the north bank for the past three <br />years. He stated that the BLM was moving toward planning the area for stream enhancement. He thought <br />the process might take as long as five years. He asked the City to reprioritize the project to “capture the <br />synergy” of the BLM and act before the neighborhood advocates had “all become senile.” <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy closed the public hearing. She called for council questions and comments. <br /> <br />Councilor Pryor, seconded by Councilor Solomon, moved to keep the record open for <br />seven days. Roll call vote; the motion passed unanimously, 8:0. <br /> <br />Councilor Pryor thanked everyone for staying for the hearing. He commented that the process needed to be <br />deliberate. He noted that there were some jurisdictional issues to work through, but it was important to <br />continue working on projects. He related that the Lane Board of County Commissioners adopted a <br />resolution asking the City Council to slow down and work more actively with them. He thought the council <br />should take that into consideration. He said his support for the PROS Plan list would be dependent on <br />getting through some of the collaborative aspects of it. <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council April 10, 2006 Page 18 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />