My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 6 - PH/Cell Towers
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-12/06/04Mtg
>
Item 6 - PH/Cell Towers
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:53:55 PM
Creation date
12/1/2004 2:43:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
12/6/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
172
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page ] of 3 <br /> <br />Main Iflenti~ . <br /> <br />From: "Donna Murray" <peffume@afn.org> <br />To: <monancraig~juno,com> <br />Sen[: Sunday, January 25, 2004 5:32 PM <br />Subject: Concord MA ordinances for Cell tower placenlent <br /> <br />From: Marcia Rasmussen <MRasmussen~3,Concordner.org> <br /> <br />Donna, <br />We are continuing to refine and improve our zoning tbr cell towers. There is <br />a group here in Concord tlmt has provided <br />Concord zoning bylaw (Concord Citizens for K~pon~ible Tower Siting), They <br />have baen working <br />learn more at their website <br /> <br />We have also had the benefit(?) of litigation with AT&T, and are responding <br />to many of the issues raised in that case. Our bylaw w~ amended at ~is <br />year's To~ Meeting, ~o I hope you have the revised version. The amendment <br />expanded ~e area of the dis~ict, provided a mechaaism for granting waivers <br />~om tiao requirements (rather ~h~ requiring a variance from requirements, <br />which put the Town and wireless communication facility providers into a <br />Catch-22 situation) and addressed some of the tecNaical issues that were <br />problematic. However, the m~endment was ~rther ~ended on the floor of To~ <br />Meeting by the citizen's group, which has created some problems with our new <br />bylaw. <br /> <br />You noted that it appem's that it would be up to the local jurisdictions <br />do their own or require their own monitoring by an independent firm. This <br />is so t~e. We require, through the Board of Appeals decision, a~ual <br />monitoring of these facilities by an independent consuhant. I don't ~ow <br />about the success of this requirement, since I'm not the p~y designated to <br />receive the reports. I will need to research ~is ft~er and will let you <br />knOW. <br /> <br />On the subject of Concord's 1000 foot setback from schools, this is based on <br />towers being ~ attractive nuisance, We had an incident in the neighboring <br />community where a young man commilted suicide by jumping from a tower just <br />prior to ~e development of our bylaw language. We also have had some ve~ <br />cremive senior high school graduation pranks involving the radio station <br />tower at the school. This is t~e basis for the 1000 foot setback from <br />schools. <br /> <br />I hope this iMo~ation is use~fl m you. The whole field of wireless <br />communication is so new, we are continually learning more and t~ing to <br />improve m~ response to the teelmology and the need while being conscious of <br />tiao visual and aesthetic impacts to ~hc communi~, ks ~ot an easy <br />challenge. Please let me ~ow if I can be of Rtrflaer assist~ce. <br /> <br />Marcia Rasmussen <br />Director of Pla~ing ~d L~d Managemen~ <br />To~ of Concord, MA <br /> <br /> 2/9/04 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.