Laserfiche WebLink
(IAP2). The council was introduced to some of the IAP2 concepts at the November 17, 2004, work <br />session on neighborhood groups. The "IAP2 Core Values for Public Participation" were developed <br />for use in defining and implementing public participation processes. The purpose of these core <br />values is to help make better decisions which reflect the interests and concerns of potentially <br />affected people and entities. <br /> <br />Core Values for the Practice of Public Participation <br /> <br /> 1. The public should have a say in decisions about actions that affect their lives. <br /> 2. Public participation includes the promise that the public's contribution will influence the <br /> decision. <br /> 3. The public participation process communicates the interests and meets the process needs of <br /> all participants. <br /> 4. The public participation process seeks out and facilitates the involvement of those <br /> potentially affected. <br /> 5. The public participation process involves participants in defining how they participate. <br /> 6. The public participation process provides participants with the information they need to <br /> participate in a meaningful way. <br /> 7. The public participation process communicates to participants how their input affected the <br /> decision. <br /> Copyright IAP2. All rights reserved. <br /> <br />In Attachment B, the IAP2 Public Participation Toolbox provides examples of a broad range of <br />tools and techniques that are available to generate public participation in ways that incorporate the <br />interests and concerns of the community while addressing the policy issues relevant to the council <br />and the functional needs of City staff. The IAP2 Public Participation Spectrum included as <br />Attachment C identifies specific public participation goals and examples of the tools and techniques <br />available to accomplish those goals. The overall goal is to develop and implement a process that <br />promotes a true dialogue involving all the stakeholders. <br /> <br />The participants in this dialogue consist of three primary groups: 1) a Staff Team consisting of <br />representatives from all departments using office space in the downtown area, Facility Management <br />to manage the project, and staff with special knowledge in key professional or technical areas <br />related to the project; 2) a Consultant Team consisting of a consultant with an established record of <br />successfully leading public participation processes and consensus-building related to public <br />development issues, a local architect with a demonstrated involvement in and understanding of <br />community and downtown issues, an expert in sustainable design (could be one or both of the two <br />previous consultants), along with various engineers and other consultants (in steps 2 and 3) as <br />required to meet the specific needs of the project; and 3) the public, using as many public <br />participation techniques as necessary to ensure a broad range of viewpoints is represented. <br /> <br />The master planning and public participation process envisioned for the City government complex <br />would consist of three steps as summarized in Attachment D. Note that each of the three steps <br />would conclude with the opportunity for the City Council to weigh in and give approval before <br />proceeding to the next step. A description of the public involvement component of a more <br />traditional master planning processes is included in Attachment E. <br /> <br /> L:\CMO\2005 Council Agendas\M050110\S050110C.doc <br /> <br /> <br />