Laserfiche WebLink
Section Three: Risk Assessment <br /> <br />day. All data, unless otherwise noted, is ot,tained from computer-aided dispatch (CAD) records. <br />The FY03 decline is due to a County-mand ated reduction in Eugene's previously assigned <br />Ambulance Service Area effective May 1, 2002. <br /> <br /> Figure 3.1 Total Fire & EMS Incidents by Year <br /> <br /> T( Incidents <br /> <br /> 20000 <br /> 15000 <br /> 10000 <br /> 5000 <br /> 0 <br /> FYO0 FYO FY02 FY03 FY04 <br /> <br /> Table 3.4 Total Eugene Fire & EMS Incidents by Year <br /> <br /> FY00 ~:Y01 Fy02 FY03 FY04 <br /> Total 17,876 18,620 18,958 ;17,669 18,054 <br /> Daily Avg~ 49 51 52 48 49 <br /> <br />Eugene classifies incident types as follows <br /> o Fires <br /> o EMS First Response <br /> o Hazardous Materials Incidents <br /> o Rescues (includes a variety of spe( ialized rescue scenarios) <br /> o Miscellaneous calls <br /> o Public Assists <br /> o Mutual Aid <br /> o Ambulance calls (where first resp(,nse is provided by another agency) <br /> o Medical Transport <br /> <br />In analyzing each type of incident, EFD lo >ked at the frequency of incidents over time, as well <br />as a temporal analysis of aggregated data, ~:o determine the demand patterns for response services <br />at various times of the day. Data from FYi)l, FY02, and FY03 were used in this analysis. <br /> <br />An extensive study of the EMS system wa~ conducted by the department in 2001. Data from <br />that study is also included in this analysis. Note that "Medical Transport" occurs on calls that are <br /> <br /> 23 <br /> <br /> <br />