Laserfiche WebLink
Section Six: Time and On-Scene Performance <br /> <br />performance both before and after the reassignment of Engine 9 (Valley River) to Engine 11 <br />(Santa Clara), which occurred July 1, 2002. <br /> <br />We have included response times for all structure fires and have indicated the travel time for the <br />last-arriving unit of the initial dispatch. This is generally the period of time it takes to assemble <br />an effective initial response force. Nearly half of all structure fires did not require the full 15- <br />personnel response. A response of less than 15 personnel would usually occur when first <br />arriving crews determine during their initial size-up that the fire does not require the full first <br />alarm response resources and cancel, or return, some of the responding crews. More detail about <br />on-scene operations is provided in Section Four. In addition, we have measured the travel time <br />for the 15th person to arrive at only those structure fire incidents where 15 or more personnel <br />were needed. <br /> <br />The longer response times reported for FY03 as compared to FY02 can be attributed to the <br />following factors: <br /> <br /> 1. The addition of the Santa Clara area to the department's primary fire response area. EFD <br /> has assumed direct responsibility for a new geographical area, but has not added fire <br /> response resources. As a result, the existing resource base is spread more thinly, and <br /> units are more frequently responding to incidents outside their first-in areas. This issue is <br /> discussed in more detail in Section Seven. <br /> <br /> 2. A significant increase in time spent at the City's Emergency Services Center drill field <br /> conducting essential training and development activities. The recent increase in this type <br /> of work has resulted from the higher-than-usual number of retirements precipitated by <br /> recent changes to the Public Employees' Retirement System. While companies remain <br /> available to respond to calls for service during these activities, they may be out of optimal <br /> position for response when an incident occurs. <br /> <br /> Table 6.9 Response Time Performance for Structure Fires FY02 <br /> <br /> Risk Area "A" and "B" I Call Processin[I Turnout <br /> 80th Percentile I 1:40 1:26 <br /> Risk Area "A" Travel Timeste0th Percentile First Arriving Unit t Last Arriving Unit ] Arrival of 15th Pers°n3:58 8:38 8:52 <br /> Risk Area "B" Travel Times First Arrivin[i Unit I Last Arriving Unit Arrival of 15th Person <br /> 80th Percentile 7:15 I 14:00 13:07 <br /> <br /> 63 <br /> <br /> <br />