My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B - Fire/EMS Stds of Cover
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 01/26/05 WS
>
Item B - Fire/EMS Stds of Cover
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:11:22 PM
Creation date
1/19/2005 11:01:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/26/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Section Eight: Concentration of Resources <br /> <br /> SECTION EIGHT: Concentration of Resources <br /> <br />Concentration refers to the spacing of multiple resource~ within close enough proximity to allow <br />an initial effective response force to be assembled on scene within prescribed timeframes. An <br />initial effective response force is one that has been deemed capable of stopping the escalation of <br />a fire emergency, stabilizing a medical scene, effecting a rescue, and successfully handling an <br />incident. <br /> <br />Consideration of unit concentration must take into account the substantial reliance of all of the <br />region's fire service organizations on closest forces agreements and automatic aid. This refers to <br />mixed jurisdictional response packages that may comprise 1st, 2nd, 3rd, or greater alarm <br />assignments. <br /> <br />Analysis of the concentration of units during the FY04 fiscal year (shown in Table 6.9 in Section <br />Six) led to the following conclusions measured against the NFPA 1710 and OSHA standards for <br />response to structure fires. Responses to the entire fire protection area (Risk Categories A and <br />B) were included, because OSHA applies to all structure fire response, and NFPA 1710 does not <br />distinguish between different risk areas for this purpose. <br /> <br />c~ Turnout time at the 90th percentile was 1:48, which is over the one-minute turnout time <br /> standard by 48 seconds. <br />o 1st unit travel time at the 90th percentile was 5:29, which is over the four-minute travel time <br /> standard by 1:29. <br />o 1st engine travel time at the 90th percentile was 5:43. <br />O 2nd engine is the usual method of meeting the OSHA Two-In/Two-Out rule. Travel time for <br /> nd th <br /> the 2 engine at the 90 percentile was 7:15. <br />o The department met the deployment standard of 15 firefighters on scene on 37 structure fires, <br /> but the travel time to do so was 12:07 at the 90th percentile, exceeding the 8-minute standard <br /> time by 4:07. <br /> <br />To deploy 15 firefighters on scene requires our basic structural fire response package comprised <br />of the following: <br /> <br />TYPE OF COMPANIES/UNITS NUMBER OF COMPANIES/UNITS NUMBER OF FIREFIGHTERS <br />Engines 3 9 <br />Truck 1 3 <br />Dual-Role Medic Unit 1 2 <br />Chief Officer 1 1 <br />NOTE: This response is for a single-family dwelling fire. For multi-unit dwellings, commercial, <br />industrial, or high-rise fires, larger response assignments comprise the 1 st alarm response. <br /> <br />The data shows that EFD's current concentration of resources is falling short of the NFPA 1710 <br />standard, while the OSHA Two-In/Two-Out Rule is being met. This is because the OSHA rule <br />is based on the number of firefighters who must be on scene before an entry is made, <br />independent of deployment-based response times. If this trend is not reversed, the department <br /> <br /> 69 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.