Laserfiche WebLink
Section Nine: Response Reliability <br /> <br /> SECTION NINE: Response Reliabili ,ty <br /> <br />Response reliability is the probability that the resources assigned to a territory will be available <br />to respond from within that territory when an emergency occurs in that area. Response reliability <br />would be 100% if every company were available in its station when a fire or emergency call is <br />received. In reality, there are times when a call is received when the first-due company is out of <br />area or unavailable. This requires that a later-due company, in the pre-determined response <br />order, be assigned. If the later-due company is too far away, the call cannot be handled within <br />the desired travel time. <br /> <br />As the number of emergency calls per day, training demands, and other routine activities <br />increase, so does the probability that the first-due company will be out of area or unavailable <br />when a call is received (decreased reliability). <br />Constraints in the existing CAD limit the ability of the Eugene Fire & EMS Department to easily <br />isolate and analyze which calls could not be handled by the assigned first-due company. To <br />present the total picture, we have analyzed the number of calls that were not handled by the first- <br />due company. <br />Data covering FY02 through FY04 are included to compare reliability rates after deployment <br />changes were made in August 2002 (which was the second month of FY03). These changes <br />included the closing of a dual-role medic unit at the Bailey Hill Station and replacing it with a <br />combination crew that can serve on either the engine or the medic unit, reassigning the Valley <br />River Station engine to a new Santa Clara station, and the addition of dynamically deployed <br />medic units staffed during peak hours. These new single-role medic units are not included in the <br />analysis below, as they have no predetermined first-in area. To the extent that they are <br />dispatched, the department's overall response reliability is actually greater than the following <br />figures indicate. <br />Table 9.1 FY02 (July 1, 2001 - June 30, 2002) <br /> <br /> First Due 1st due company 1st due company Response <br /> Station Incidents dispatched not dispatched Reliabilit~ <br /> EGF 1 1701 1605 96 94.36% <br /> EGF2 1072 1020 52 95.15 % <br /> EGF3 516 481 35 93.22% <br /> EGF5 896 837 59 93.42% <br /> EGF6 1009 872 137 86.42% <br /> EGF7 736 650 86 88.32% <br /> EGF8 800 744 56 93.00% <br /> EGF9 623 585 38 93.90% <br /> EGF10 1086 943 143 86.83% <br /> EGF 11 0 NA NA NA <br /> EGF12 52 49 3 94.23% <br /> TOTAL 8491 7786 705 91.70% <br /> <br /> 71 <br /> <br /> <br />