Item B - Fire/EMS Stds of Cover - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Section Nine: Response Reliability Table 9.2 FY03 (July 1, 2002 - June 30, 2003) First Due 1st due 1st due company Response Station Incidents compan), dispatched not dispatched Reliability EGF1 1769 1619 150 91.52% EGF2 1015 951 64 93.69% EGF3 524 461 63 87.98% EGF5 994 909 85 91.45% EGF6 1016 893 123 87.89% EGF7 779 683 96 87.68% EGF8 862 802 60 93.04% EGF9 575 325 250 56.52% EGF10 783 715 68 91.32% EGF11 560 432 128 77.14% EGF 12 31 31 0 100.00% TOTAL 8908 7821 1087 87.80% Tabh 9.3 FY04 (July 1, 2003 - June 30, 2004) First Due 1st due company 1st due company Respon Station Incidents dispatched not dispatched Reliability EGF-1 1568 1392 176 88.78% EGF-2 980 917 63 93.57% EGF-3 535 483 52 90.28% EGF-5 976 897 79 91.91% EGF-6 891 751 140 84.29% EGF-7 785 650 135 82.80% EGF-8 777 712 65 91.63% EGF-9 607 331 276 54.53% EGF-10 795 695 100 87.42% EGF-11 647 533 114 82.38% EGF-12 45 44 1 97.78% Total (Eugene) 8606 7405 1201 85.94% These tables show that during fiscal year 2002, Eugene Fire & EMS had an average response reliability of 91.70%, with a low of 86.42% (Sheldon Station) and a high of 95.15% (Whiteaker Station). In FY03, the average dropped to 87.80% with a low of 56.52% (Valley River Station) and a high of 93.69% (Whiteaker Station). Valley River Station's reliability decreased because it is currently only staffed by a medic unit. Excluding Valley River Station, the overall average is 89.96% for FY03. Data for FY04 shows a similar pattern to that of FY02. At first glance it seems counterintuitive that reliability at Sheldon Station would increase in FY03 because it is covering more of Valley River Station's area. At the time the Valley River engine was reassigned to Santa Clara, the department began an automatic move-up policy any time the Sheldon engine was out of quarters. This has increased reliability at Sheldon Station but 72