Laserfiche WebLink
Section Ten: Historical Perspective <br /> <br /> SECTION TEN: Historical Perspective <br /> <br />The evaluation of historical performance is accomplished by looking at data describing actual <br />responses, and answering questions based on that data. <br /> <br />Question #1. Is the Eugene Fire and EMS Department meeting its historic response time goals? <br />If not, why not? <br /> <br />For a number of reasons the department does not meet the response time goals that were set <br />years ago. First, the goals were originally established as desirable service targets. However, <br />they did not use actual historical performance to determine what was realistically achievable <br />within the available resource base. <br /> <br />LCOG conducted a comprehensive Fire Station Location Study for the organization in 1990, and <br />then updated in 1993 and 1998. This information was useful in identifying areas that were <br />underserved, based on response times and travel distances from existing fire stations in Eugene. <br /> <br />The findings of these studies and the associated analysis eventually led to the Fire Redeployment <br />Project of the 1990s. That project, in turn, resulted in the closing of three old stations, the <br />construction of two new stations, and the redeployment of existing emergency response <br />resources to provide improved coverage throughout the service area. <br /> <br />However, it was assumed, for purposes of the study, that any area in which more than 50% of the <br />calls were reached in 4 minutes or less had adequate coverage. Today we have a clearer <br />definition of standards of coverage. <br /> <br />Second, our service area has experienced greatly increasing traffic volume and congestion, which <br />slows emergency response, particularly on certain days and at certain times. In addition, a <br />significant number of traffic calming projects have been installed on Eugene streets. These, too, <br />serve to slow all traffic, including emergency responders. This aspect is discussed in greater <br />detail in Section Three. <br /> <br />Finally, and most significantly, the number of calls for service has risen dramatically while the <br />total number of personnel and companies has remained relatively static for more than 20 years. <br />In FY81 the department had 152 paid shift personnel plus volunteers; today it has 156 <br />firefighting FTE. In FY81, it took 45 personnel to staff a 24-hour shift; today we do so with 43 <br />fire fighting personnel plus up to four single-role paramedics. (The current number varies <br />depending on the time of day and number of single-role medics on duty.) In that same time <br />period, the number of calls for service has risen nearly five-fold, from 2,822 in 1981 to 13,350 in <br />2002 (not including calls for ambulance only). These changes are shown in Figure 10.1 and <br />Table 10.1. <br /> <br />Our ability to maintain an adequate level of service over this period is a result of former excess <br />capacity, which is now exhausted, the changes made during the Fire Redeployment Project, and <br />improvements in technology such as traffic signal pre-emption. In addition, we have increased <br /> <br /> 74 <br /> <br /> <br />