Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL OPTIONS <br />1. Adopt the proposed ordinance before the council. <br /> <br /> The council is scheduled to take action on February 14. Adopting the proposed ordinance would <br /> prohibit smoking within 25 feet of entrances, outdoor air intakes and operable windows of City- <br /> owned buildings within the Eugene city limits. It would provide other public agencies the option to <br /> extend smoke-free areas from 10 to 25 feet outside entrances, operable windows and intakes. <br /> <br /> The proposed ordinance also includes standards for outdoor smoking areas, such as smoking decks <br /> at bars, which now are allowed through administrative rule. The current ordinance prohibits <br /> smoking in an "enclosed area" open to the public and defines that term, but it does not clearly define <br /> when an area no longer is considered "enclosed." The administrative rule adopted in 2002 provides <br /> some guidance, but is not as clear as it could be. Language proposed for the ordinance would <br /> achieve the same outcome as the rule (minimum 25 percent opening in walls), but through clearer <br /> language. For public information and compliance purposes, it also is helpful to locate the provision <br /> with other applicable requirements in the code itself. On a separate matter, the proposed ordinance <br /> would restrict the ability of public agencies to establish designated smoking areas adjacent to <br /> entrances. <br /> <br /> The changes would aid indoor air quality by better controlling tobacco smoke's entry to buildings, <br /> and reduce contact with tobacco smoke for those entering, exiting and congregating near City <br /> building entrances. The ordinance would help the City meet LEED (green building) standards for <br /> existing buildings. New signs at City-owned buildings would be needed. The estimated cost for <br /> signage is $2,000. <br /> <br />2. Leave the ordinance as is. <br /> <br /> If the council prefers this option, no action is required. With this approach, the City and other public <br /> agencies would have greater difficulty meeting LEED (green building) standards for existing <br /> buildings. Tobacco smoke could more easily enter buildings. For information and compliance <br /> purposes, staff would continue to rely on the administrative rule to address outdoor smoking areas. <br /> <br />3. Direct staff to prepare different revisions to the ordinance. <br /> <br />CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION <br />The City Manager recommends that the council adopt Option 1, the proposed ordinance. <br /> <br />SUGGESTED MOTION <br />Move to set action for February 14, 2005, for adoption of the proposed ordinance revising Tobacco <br />Products and Smoking regulations. <br /> <br /> L:\CMO\2005 Council Agendas\M050124\S0501244.doc <br /> <br /> <br />