My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B: Solid Waste Collection/Fee Structure
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2007
>
CC Agenda - 08/13/07 Work Session
>
Item B: Solid Waste Collection/Fee Structure
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:16:31 PM
Creation date
8/9/2007 8:58:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
8/13/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
8 Chapter Three <br /> <br /> <br />Customization Required <br />The Model must be customized to reflect each licensed hauler’s chart of accounts. <br />However, the Model allocates expenses in a consistent manner that will enhance the <br />comparability and usability of the data by City staff. <br />Underlying Assumptions <br />The Model is built around several underlying assumptions that reflect City rate policies and <br />affect the Model’s calculations and allocations. The user should understand these <br />assumptions to properly interpret the Model’s end product. <br /> <br />Disposal and processing expenses <br /> are allocated between Eugene customers and All Other <br />customers and among residential, commercial and drop box customers based on the volume <br />of customers’ subscribed service levels. The Model assumes that approximately six and <br />one-third 32-gallon cans equal one cubic yard and that all containers of equal size weigh the <br />same. To the extent that customers in a community consistently dispose of heavier or <br />lighter trash, the allocation of disposal and processing expenses could be skewed. <br /> <br />Labor costs <br /> are allocated between Eugene customers and All Other customers and among <br />residential, commercial and drop box customers based on the number of drivers that service <br />the communities. Thus, the model assumes that each hauler’s drivers are compensated at <br />the same level, regardless of the community they serve. To the extent that there are <br />significant differences in wages paid to, or benefits earned by, drivers in different <br />communities, the allocation of labor costs could be skewed. <br /> <br />Vehicle costs <br /> are allocated between Eugene customers and All Other customers and among <br />residential, commercial and drop box customers based on the number of routes in each <br />community. Mixed routes (routes that service more than one community) are split based on <br />the number of accounts on that route in each community. Thus, the Model assumes that the <br />time to service each account on a mixed route is the same, regardless of other operational <br />factors (e.g. traffic, housing density, distance to the disposal site, etc.). To the extent that <br />the hauler has numerous mixed routes in very different service areas, the allocation of <br />vehicle costs could be skewed. <br /> <br />General and administrative costs <br /> are allocated between Eugene customers and All Other <br />customers and among residential, commercial and drop box customers based on the number <br />of customers. Thus, the Model assumes that each account takes the same level of <br />administrative effort to service and maintain. To the extent that the hauler spends <br />significantly more administrative effort on a particular customer base, the allocation of <br />general and administrative costs could be skewed. <br />Software Requirements <br />To use the Model, users must have Microsoft Excel 97/98 for Windows or Microsoft Office <br />98 Excel Version 8.0 for Macintosh. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.