Laserfiche WebLink
Excerpted from the minutes to the September 13, 2007 MPC Meeting <br />Note: these minutes have yet to be approved by the MPC. <br />Oregon MPO Consortium (OMPOC) Legislative Policy Concepts and Objectives <br />Mr. Vanderpool reviewed the second draft of the OMPOC legislative statement and said changes <br />reflected in legislative format had come from other MPOs. He asked for feedback from MPC <br />members on any changes they wished to see in the document so that an updated version could be <br />considered for approval at the next MPC meeting. <br />Ms. Piercy commented that the document had been referred to the Eugene City Council’s <br />Intergovernmental Relations Committee but a response had not yet been received. <br />Mr. Evans asked that advocacy for funding for senior and disabled transit accessibility be more <br />specifically stated in the last bulleted item in the statement. He said accessibility was currently an <br />unfunded mandate for transit and the demand for those services was growing each year. <br />Mr. Leiken emphasized the importance of having clear, written directives from the Oregon <br />Transportation Commission to assure consistency, particularly when policies related to allocation <br />or reprogramming of funds and match requirements were involved. <br />Mr. Van Vactor noted that the first and fourth bulleted items were similar, although the fourth <br />item did not mention capacity. He suggested those items be merged. <br />Ms. Volta suggested rewording the second bulleted item as follows: Engage Oregon’s <br />Congressional delegation to secure and prioritize strategic and sustainable federal investments in <br />Oregon’s transportation infrastructure. She said that sometimes priorities established by certain <br />bodies did not meet an area’s needs. She said all jurisdictions needed more funding, but was not <br />certain how decisions about the allocation of funds was made and who was involved in those <br />decisions. <br />Ms. Ballew said it was always a challenge to decide where to spend funds in an area with small, <br />medium and large jurisdictions. <br />