My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item A: Budget Service Realignment
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2007
>
CC Agenda - 10/17/07 Work Session
>
Item A: Budget Service Realignment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:57:36 PM
Creation date
10/12/2007 2:01:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
10/17/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
N <br />ative Americans have many sayings, and one of the wisestexpenses look smaller. Similarly, some states have urged retailers <br />is this: When youÕre riding a dead horse, the best strategythat normally submit their June sales tax receipts in July (next fiscal <br />is to dismount. Traditional budgeting, which focuses on <br />year) to do so in June, thus propping up the current year's rev- <br />costs rather than results, is the dead horse of the public sector. <br />enues. ItÕs all legal and properly accounted for, but it does not <br />When we budget for costs, we get more of them. What we donÕt get <br />reflect the governmentÕs true financial condition. <br />is the innovation and accountability for results we need if we are <br />to win the competition for public support. <br />Even when the general fund is legally prohib- <br />Borrowing. <br />ited from being in debt, governments find ways to borrow. New <br />Winning back the public support we have lost over the past 40 <br />York City mastered this dubious art in the 1970s, when it piled up <br />years is the greatest challenge we face in government today. Yet <br />so much debt that it landed in receivership. Both the city and state <br />when faced with deficits, many governments resort to politically <br />of New York are still trying to figure out when and how to pay off <br />expedient budget and accounting practices that only deepen pub- <br />all the bonds issued back when New York truly was, in former <br />lic cynicism. The public finance literature refers to such practices <br />Mayor John LindsayÕs famous phrase, ÒFun City.Ó <br />as Òfiscal illusions,Ó since they distort the ability of stakeholders to <br />evaluate the true costs and benefits of gov- <br />During the current fiscal crisis, several <br />ernment programs. Seven such illusions are <br />states have proven that the Òwhat me worryÓ <br />particularly harmful to the financial credi- <br />politics of borrowing works for both political <br />bility of state and local governments: <br />parties. Instead of making the difficult deci- <br />sions necessary to secure their long-term fis- <br />When <br />cal health, these states borrowed their way to <br />Robbing Peter to pay Paul. <br />that general fund gets in trouble, some lead- <br />ÒbalancedÓ budgets either through outright <br />ers start eyeing Òoff budgetÓ funds as <br />deficit financing or less transparent means <br />resources to be mined. One state govern-such as pension obligation bonds. These <br />maneuvers failed to convince the credit rat- <br />ment helped balance its budget by transfer- <br />ing agencies, which in some cases lowered <br />ring the cost of running a waterway system <br />their ratings to junk-bond status. <br />from the general fund (Òon budgetÓ) to the <br />toll road authority (Òoff budgetÓ). Another <br />state transferred management of a conven- <br />When times are <br />Selling off assets. <br />tion center and parking garage to the state <br />tight, it is popular to sell surplus buildings, <br />pension fund to lower its cash contribution <br />land, or other assets, and then use the pro- <br />from the general fund. Technically, this <br />ceeds to plug a hole in the operating budget <br />allowed the state to show a savings of $175 <br />by treating the real estate money as though it <br />million. Robbing Peter to pay Paul can plug a <br />were ÒnormalÓ revenue. For example, <br />hole to make the budget look better this year, <br />instead of resolving a significant structural <br />but the same hole will reappear next year, <br />budget problem, the leaders of one city gov- <br />when Peter and Paul will both be worse off. <br />ernment decided to sell the water and sewer <br />works to the off-balance sheet entity that operated it. A year later, the <br />city sold $51.2 million in tax and sewage liensÑmoney due to the <br />Using accounting gimmicks to disguise Þscal prob- <br />city that it not yet been able to collectÑfor $32.2 million. The city <br />As the Enron debacle showed, accounting presents leaders <br />lems. <br />has continued to rely on one-shot revenue sources to balance the <br />with many dangerous choices. Quick-fix accounting gimmicks <br />annual budget, putting off the crisis for one more year. <br />include pretending (or even requiring) that money you expect to <br />receive early next year will actually come in late this year. The <br />opposite side of the coin is to pretend (or even require) thatA budget is really just a forecast, a <br />Making something up. <br />expenses planned for this year will be made, technically, next year.statement of expected revenues and expenses. If done correctly it <br />can be a serviceable estimate. But in the end, every budget is <br />For example, some states have informed school districts expecting <br />based on assumptions, and you can make it look better or worse <br />a school-aid payment in the current fiscal year that they will not <br />simply by changing those assumptions. <br />receive it until the next fiscal year, thus making the current year's <br />October 2004 <br />Government Finance Review11 <br />| <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.